Emergency intracardiac defibrillation for refractory ventricular fibrillation

Hemodynamically unstable ventricular arrhythmias induced during electrophysiologic testing almost always respond to prompt application of direct current transthoracic shocks. In rare cases, however, ventricular fibrillation may be refractory to conventional treatment. Recently, a technique of intrac...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical cardiology (Mahwah, N.J.) Vol. 18; no. 2; pp. 109 - 111
Main Authors Haught, W. Herbert, Conti, Jamie B., Tucker, Kelly J., Curtis, Anne B.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Wiley Periodicals, Inc 01.02.1995
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Hemodynamically unstable ventricular arrhythmias induced during electrophysiologic testing almost always respond to prompt application of direct current transthoracic shocks. In rare cases, however, ventricular fibrillation may be refractory to conventional treatment. Recently, a technique of intracardiac defibrillation has been successfully used to resuscitate patients with ventricular fibrillation refractory to transthoracic defibrillation. We describe two patients with a history of myocardial infarction and left ventricular dysfunction who were admitted with symptomatic episodes of ventricular tachycardia. Both had inducible sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. During a repeat electrophysiologic study in Patient No. 1 on procainamide and at the initial study in Patient No. 2, right ventricular burst pacing to terminate ventricular tachycardia resulted in ventricular fibrillation refractory to resuscitation efforts, including transthoracic defibrillation with 360 J. Emergency intracardiac defibrillation with 200 and 360 J, respectively, successfully converted both patients to sinus rhythm. Both patients were subsequently discharged from the hospital on amiodarone. These cases illustrate the life‐saving capabilities of intracardiac defibrillation.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Case Study-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-4
content type line 23
ObjectType-Report-1
ObjectType-Article-3
ISSN:0160-9289
1932-8737
DOI:10.1002/clc.4960180214