The incidence of breast cancer among female flight attendants: an updated meta-analysis

Several studies have indicated an increased risk of breast cancer (BC) among female flight attendants (FFAs); however, the results from epidemiological studies were not consistent. We thus conducted an updated meta-analysis to re-assess the risk of BC among FFAs, according to the MOOSE guideline. A...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of travel medicine Vol. 23; no. 6; p. taw055
Main Authors Liu, Tiebing, Zhang, Chanyuan, Liu, Chong
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England 01.06.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Several studies have indicated an increased risk of breast cancer (BC) among female flight attendants (FFAs); however, the results from epidemiological studies were not consistent. We thus conducted an updated meta-analysis to re-assess the risk of BC among FFAs, according to the MOOSE guideline. A systematical search of PubMed and Embase for relevant observational studies up to March 2016 was performed, supplemented by manual reviews of bibliographies in relevant studies. A random effect model was conducted to calculate the combined standard incidence ratio (SIR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) in BC risk. Of the 719 citations retrieved, 10 were included, with more than 31 679 participants and 821 new cases. The combined SIR (95% CI) for BC in FFAs was 1.40 (95%CI 1.30-1.50), with no significant heterogeneity (P = 0.744; I(2 )=( )0.0%) or publication bias (Begg's test: z = 0.72, P = 0.474; Egger's test: t = 0.25, P = 0.805) among the included studies. The results were not significantly modified by publication year, geographic area, study quality or whether the fertility variables were adjusted. Our meta-analysis suggests that FFAs have a higher risk of BC compared with the general population. More vigorous studies with larger sample sizes based on other populations, including the Chinese, are needed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:1195-1982
1708-8305
DOI:10.1093/jtm/taw055