P2Y12 receptor inhibitors in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome in the real world: use, patient selection, and outcomes from contemporary European registries
Abstract Aims Non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) is present in about 60–70% of patients admitted with acute coronary syndromes in clinical practice. This study provides a ‘real-life’ overview of NSTE-ACS patient characteristics, dual antiplatelet therapy clinical practice, and outco...
Saved in:
Published in | European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy Vol. 2; no. 4; pp. 229 - 243 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Oxford University Press
01.10.2016
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Abstract
Aims
Non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) is present in about 60–70% of patients admitted with acute coronary syndromes in clinical practice. This study provides a ‘real-life’ overview of NSTE-ACS patient characteristics, dual antiplatelet therapy clinical practice, and outcomes at both the time of discharge from hospital and up to 1-year post-discharge.
Methods and results
A total of 10 registries (documenting 84 054 NSTE-ACS patients) provided data in a systematic manner on patient characteristics and outcomes for NSTE-ACS in general, and 6 of these (with 52 173 NSTE-ACS patients) also provided more specific data according to P2Y12 receptor inhibitor used. Unadjusted analyses were performed at the study level, and no formal meta-analysis was performed due to large heterogeneity between studies in the settings, patient characteristics, and outcome definitions. All-cause death rates across registries ranged from 0.76 to 4.79% in-hospital, from 1.61 to 6.65% at 30 days, from 3.66 to 7.16% at 180 days, and from 3.14 to 9.73% at 1 year. Major bleeding events were reported in up to 2.77% of patients while in hospital (in seven registries), up to 1.08% at 30 days (data from one registry only), and 2.06% at 1 year (one registry).
Conclusions
There were substantial differences in the use of and patient selection for clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor, which were associated with differences in short- and long-term ischaemic and bleeding events. In future registries, data collection should be performed in a more standardized way with respect to endpoints, definitions, and time points. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 2055-6837 2055-6845 |
DOI: | 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvw005 |