A ‘win–win’ mechanism for low-drag transients in controlled two-dimensional channel flow and its implications for sustained drag reduction

• Published in: Journal of fluid mechanics Vol. 499; pp. 183 - 196
• Main Authors: BEWLEY, THOMAS R., AAMO, OLE MORTEN
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 25.01.2004
• Subjects: Channel flow; Exact sciences and technology; Flow system; Flows in ducts, channels, nozzles, and conduits; Fluid dynamics; Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications); Heat transport; Laminar flow; Physics; Transpiration; Transpiration control; Turbulence control; Turbulent flows, convection, and heat transfer; Pipe flow; Drag reduction; Aspiration; Feedback; Digital simulation; Control systems; Incompressible fluid; Fluid injection; Turbulence structure
• ISSN: 0022-1120; 1469-7645
• DOI: 10.1017/S0022112003006852

A simple pressure-based feedback control strategy for wall-transpiration control of incompressible unsteady two-dimensional channel flow was recently investigated by Aamo, Krstic & Bewley (2003). Nonlinear two-dimensional channel flow simulations which implemented this control strategy resulted in flow transients with instantaneous drag far lower than that of the corresponding laminar flow. The present article examines the physical mechanism by which this very low level of instantaneous drag was attained. It then explores the possibility of achieving sustained drag reductions to below the laminar level by initiating such low-drag transients on a periodic basis. All attempts at sustaining the mean flow drag below the laminar level fail, perhaps providing indirect evidence in favour of the conjecture that the laminar state might provide a fundamental ‘performance limitation’ in such flows. Mathematical analysis of two-dimensional and three-dimensional channel-flow systems establishes a direct link between the average drag increase due to flow-field unsteadiness and a weighted space/time average of the Reynolds stress. Phenomenological justification of the conjecture is provided by a Reynolds analogy between convective momentum transport and convective heat transport. Proof of the conjecture remains an open problem.