Effect of ten thiocompounds on rat liver DNA damage induced by a small dose of N-nitrosodimethylamine

• Published in: Archives of toxicology Vol. 66; no. 4; p. 286
• Main Authors: Brambilla, G, Carlo, P, Finollo, R
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Germany 01.04.1992
• Subjects: Administration, Oral; Animals; Cell Nucleus - drug effects; Dimethylnitrosamine - antagonists & inhibitors; DNA Damage - drug effects; Free Radical Scavengers; Liver - drug effects; Liver - pathology; Male; Rabbits; Rats; Rats, Inbred Strains; Sulfur - pharmacology; Viscosity
• ISSN: 0340-5761
• DOI: 10.1007/bf02307175

The use in a chemoprevention study of high doses of the genotoxic agent might result in erroneous information because of possible nonlinearity of pharmacokinetic processes and toxicity-induced derangement of physiological defense mechanisms. According to these premises ten thiocompounds, potentially active as inhibitors of metabolic activation and/or scavengers, were examined for their capability of reducing the frequency of liver DNA lesions induced by a very small dose of N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA). This was accomplished by means of a viscometric technique previously found suitable to detect a minimal amount of DNA fragmentation. Rats were injected i.p. or i.v. with 1 mmol/kg of thiocompound, 0.2 mg/kg NDMA given by gavage 1 h afterwards, and killed for DNA damage assessment 14 h later. Statistically significant changes of viscometric parameters, which are considered indicative of a protective activity, were produced by disulfiram (DSF), and to a lower extent by diethyldithiocarbamate (DEDTC). Any modification of NDMA-induced DNA damage was absent in rats pretreated with glutathione reduced form (GSH) and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Allyl disulfide (ADS), L-cysteine (CYS), N-acetylcysteine (NAC), alpha-mercaptopropionylglycine (MPG), ethylxanthic acid (PEX), and 2-mercaptoethane sulfonic acid (MESNA) increased in various degree the frequency of DNA-strand breaks. In subsequent experiments the protective activity of DSF was found to be dose-related, dependent on the time of administration, and greater by oral route. Taken as a whole, these results suggest that several putative anticarcinogens might be ineffective against the DNA-damage produced by the low doses encountered in human exposure.