Impact of parenchyma-preserving surgical methods on treating patients with solid pseudopapillary neoplasms: A retrospective study with a large sample size

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) of the pancreas is a rare neoplasm that mainly affects young women. To evaluate the impact of parenchyma-preserving surgical methods (PPMs, including enucleation and central pancreatectomy) in the treatment of SPN patients. From 2013 to 2019, patients who underwe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery Vol. 14; no. 2; pp. 174 - 184
Main Authors Li, Yu-Qiong, Pan, Shu-Bo, Yan, Shu-Shu, Jin, Zhen-Dong, Huang, Hao-Jie, Sun, Li-Qi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 27.02.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) of the pancreas is a rare neoplasm that mainly affects young women. To evaluate the impact of parenchyma-preserving surgical methods (PPMs, including enucleation and central pancreatectomy) in the treatment of SPN patients. From 2013 to 2019, patients who underwent pancreatectomy for SPNs were retrospectively reviewed. The baseline characteristics, intraoperative index, pathological outcomes, short-term complications and long-term follow-up data were compared between the PPM group and the conventional method (CM) group. In total, 166 patients were included in this study. Of them, 33 patients (19.9%) underwent PPM. Most of the tumors (104/166, 62.7%) were found accidentally. Comparing the parameters between groups, the hospital stay d (12.35 13.5 d, = 0.49), total expense (44213 54084 yuan, = 0.21), operation duration (135 120 min, = 0.71), and intraoperative bleeding volume (200 100 mL, = 0.49) did not differ between groups. Regarding pathological outcomes, tumor size (45 32 mm, = 0.07), Ki67 index ( = 0.53), peripheral tissue invasion (11.3% 9.1%, = 0.43) and positive margin status (7.5% 6%, = 0.28) also did not differ between groups. Moreover, PPM did not increase the risk of severe postoperative pancreatic fistula (3.8% 3.0%, = 0.85) or tumor recurrence (3.0% 6.0%, = 0.39). However, the number of patients who had exocrine insufficiency during follow-up was significantly lower in the PPM group (21.8% 3%, = 0.024). CM was identified as an independent risk factor for pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (odds ratio = 8.195, 95% confident interval: 1.067-62.93). PPM for SPN appears to be feasible and safe for preserving the exocrine function of the pancreas.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Corresponding author: Li-Qi Sun, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, No. 168 Changhai Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai 200433, China. zjhzslqsmmu@qq.com
Author contributions: Li YQ, Pan SB and Yan SS contributed equally to this study and are co-first authors, were responsible for study design/planning, study conduct, data analysis and writing and revising the paper; Huang HJ and Sun LQ designed the study and they shared senior authorship; all authors have read and approve the final manuscript.
ISSN:1948-9366
1948-9366
DOI:10.4240/wjgs.v14.i2.174