MHC Haplotype Analysis by Artificial Neural Networks

• Published in: Human immunology Vol. 59; no. 1; pp. 56 - 62
• Main Authors: Bellgard, Matthew I, Tay, Guan K, Hiew, H.L, Witt, Campbell S, Ketheesan, Natkunam, Christiansen, Frank T, Dawkins, Roger L
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 1998
• Subjects: Electrophoresis, Agar Gel; Haplotypes - genetics; Histocompatibility Testing - methods; HLA Antigens - genetics; HLA-A Antigens - genetics; HLA-B Antigens - genetics; HLA-DQ Antigens - genetics; HLA-DR Antigens - genetics; Humans; Immunoblotting; Neural Networks (Computer); Polymerase Chain Reaction
• ISSN: 0198-8859; 1879-1166
• DOI: 10.1016/S0198-8859(97)00231-0

Conventional matching is based on numbers of alleles shared between donor and recipient. This approach, however, ignores the degree of relationship between alleles and haplotypes, and therefore the actual degree of difference. To address this problem, we have compared family members using a block matching technique which reflects differences in genomic sequences. All parents and siblings had been genotyped using conventional MHC typing so that haplotypes could be assigned and relatives could be classified as sharing 0, 1 or 2 haplotypes. We trained an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) with subjects from 6 families (85 comparisons) to distinguish between relatives. Using the outputs of the ANN, we developed a score, the Histocompatibility Index (HI), as a measure of the degree of difference. Subjects from a further 3 families (106 profile comparisons) were tested. The HI score for each comparison was plotted. We show that the HI score is trimodal allowing the definition of three populations corresponding to approximately 0, 1 or 2 haplotype sharing. The means and standard deviations of the three populations were found. As expected, comparisons between family members sharing 2 haplotypes resulted in high HI scores with one exception. More interestingly, this approach distinguishes between the 1 and 0 haplotype groups, with some informative exceptions. This distinction was considered too difficult to attempt visually. The approach provides promise in the quantification of degrees of histo-compatibility.