Accommodative Response of Integral Imaging in Near Distance

Objective evaluation results using optometric device to measure accommodative responses in viewing a real object and integral imaging are presented. From the empirical results between the real object and an integrated three-dimensional (3D) image, we find that over 73% of participants keep eyes on t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of display technology Vol. 8; no. 2; pp. 70 - 78
Main Authors Kim, Youngmin, Kim, Jongshin, Hong, Keehoon, Yang, Hee Kyung, Jung, Jae-Hyun, Choi, Heejin, Min, Sung-Wook, Seo, Jong-Mo, Hwang, Jeong-Min, Lee, Byoungho
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York IEEE 01.02.2012
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective evaluation results using optometric device to measure accommodative responses in viewing a real object and integral imaging are presented. From the empirical results between the real object and an integrated three-dimensional (3D) image, we find that over 73% of participants keep eyes on the real integrated 3D image instead of a display panel. The results also show the participants do not recognize a mismatch between the accommodative response and the convergence of the eye, which used to be believed as one of the major factors to cause visual fatigue in viewing near-distance integral imaging. Seventy-one normal adult subjects (23 ~ 38 years old) participated in the experiment, and accommodative response measurement results of the real integrated image show a statistically significant concordance with real objects.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1551-319X
1558-9323
DOI:10.1109/JDT.2011.2163701