Remedial Interventions to Address Receptivity to Feedback in Master's‐Level Counseling Students

Remediation is an essential gatekeeping responsibility, yet counselor education lacks consensus on the best way to approach student remediation. We used Q methodology to explore the remediation practices of 28 counselor educators employed full‐time in accredited university programs. Four factors eme...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCounselor education and supervision Vol. 60; no. 4; pp. 274 - 290
Main Authors Salpietro, Lena, Clark, Madeline, Kress, Victoria, Laux, John, Walker, Tanesha
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington Wiley 01.12.2021
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects
College Faculty
counselor competency
Counselor education
Counselor Educators
Counselor Training
Feedback
Feedback (Response)
gatekeeping
gateslipping
Graduate Students
Graduate studies
Intervention
Masters Programs
Q Methodology
Reflective Teaching
Remedial education
Remedial Instruction
remediation
Teacher Student Relationship
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Remediation is an essential gatekeeping responsibility, yet counselor education lacks consensus on the best way to approach student remediation. We used Q methodology to explore the remediation practices of 28 counselor educators employed full‐time in accredited university programs. Four factors emerged: Due Process, Reflective Practice, Remedial Coursework, and Preserve Programmatic Status.
Bibliography:This study was supported by a grant from the North Central Association for Counselor Education and Supervision.
ISSN:0011-0035
1556-6978
DOI:10.1002/ceas.12216