Differential effectiveness, efficiency, and acceptability of drill‐based interventions targeting multiplication facts

Math facts are foundational for later math skill development, but many students demonstrate difficulties with math facts in early schooling. Drill‐based interventions have been shown to effectively target foundational academic skills; however, there is limited research examining drill‐based interven...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPsychology in the schools Vol. 60; no. 7; pp. 2520 - 2539
Main Authors Adams, Sarah R., Maki, Kathrin E.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley 01.07.2023
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Math facts are foundational for later math skill development, but many students demonstrate difficulties with math facts in early schooling. Drill‐based interventions have been shown to effectively target foundational academic skills; however, there is limited research examining drill‐based interventions for teaching math facts compared to basic reading skills. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of incremental rehearsal (IR), traditional drill (TD), and strategic incremental rehearsal (SIR) on multiplication fact retention, fluency, and maintenance outcomes with 36 fourth and fifth graders. The study also examined intervention efficiency and treatment acceptability. Results showed no differences in retention, maintenance, or treatment acceptability across the interventions. There were significant differences in fluency at posttest, with IR resulting in the greatest fluency scores. Furthermore, TD was the most efficient intervention overall. Implications for practice and future research are also discussed. Practitioner points Incremental rehearsal was most effective for improving multiplication fact fluency. Traditional drill was the most efficient multiplication fact fluency intervention. Participating students reported similar levels of acceptability of all multiplication fact interventions.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0033-3085
1520-6807
DOI:10.1002/pits.22880