A Comparative study on fire hazards of cables used in nuclear power plants based on small- and large-scale experiments

• Published in: Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry Vol. 147; no. 24; pp. 14659 - 14671
• Main Authors: Tang, Kaixuan, Zhang, Ying, Jiang, Shuai, Li, Changwei, Ma, Chuyuan, Liu, Ganghua, Zhang, Hongming, Yuan, Bihe
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cham Springer International Publishing 01.12.2022; Springer; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Analytical Chemistry; Burning time; Cables; Chemistry; Chemistry and Materials Science; Combustion; Comparative analysis; Comparative studies; Cone calorimeters; Fire damage; Fire hazards; Flame retardants; Heat release rate; Inorganic Chemistry; Insulation; Measurement Science and Instrumentation; Nuclear energy; Nuclear power plants; Nuclear safety; Physical Chemistry; Polymer Sciences; Safety and security measures; Sheaths; Cone calorimeter; Heat release rate; Fire hazard; NPP flame-retardant cable; Cable tray
• ISSN: 1388-6150; 1588-2926
• DOI: 10.1007/s10973-022-11578-z

Cables are the most common combustibles in nuclear power plants (NPPs) and cable fires are the one of main threaten to the safety of NPPs. Fire characteristics and fire hazards for two typical cables used in NPPs were comparatively studied based on cone calorimeter and cable tray fire tests. The heat release rate (HRR) curves show different patterns, two-peaks and three-peaks for NPP and conventional flame retardant cables, respectively. This difference is attributed to the fire barrier, which distinguishes the burning of sheath and insulation. Moreover, the maximum value of HRR for conventional flame retardant cable is much higher than NPP flame-retardant cable, and the difference is 108 kW m −2 . The time from first peak to second peak for NPP flame-retardant cable is approximately four times as conventional flame retardant cable. Based on cable tray fire, the burning time after burner off is much longer for conventional flame retardant cable and its total mass loss is 0.52 kg, which are three times and five times as much as NPP flame-retardant cable, respectively, and it has a self-sustaining stage during cable burning. The above indicates that the NPP flame-retardant cable has less sustained damage, fire development rate and overall fire hazard. In addition, spacing has little effect on the burning time of sheath, but the burning of insulation layer is promoted, the time from first peak to second peak decreases with the increase in spacing. However, the influence of spacing is non-monotonous in cable tray fire, and the burning of cables with 10 mm spacing has higher fire hazard with a maximum mass loss rate.