Three-dimensional evaluation of lower extremity alignment during gait and standing in healthy elderly individuals: A comparative study using fluoroscopy and 3D to 2D image matching

• Published in: Bio-medical materials and engineering Vol. 36; no. 4; p. 257
• Main Authors: Soeno, Tatsuya, Sato, Takashi, Kobayashi, Koichi, Katsumi, Ryota, Otani, Kazutaka, Kawashima, Hiroyuki
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.07.2025
• Subjects: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Femur - diagnostic imaging; Femur - physiology; Fluoroscopy - methods; Gait - physiology; Humans; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods; Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging; Knee Joint - physiology; Lower Extremity - diagnostic imaging; Lower Extremity - physiology; Male; Standing Position; Tibia - diagnostic imaging; Tibia - physiology; fluoroscopic image; lower extremity alignment; world coordinate system; mid-stance phase; treadmill; healthy individual
• ISSN: 1878-3619
• DOI: 10.1177/09592989251315369

BackgroundThe differences in bony alignment of the lower extremities during gait compared to standing remain unclear.ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate three-dimentional (3D) lower extremity alignment in healthy elderly individuals during the stance phase of gait and compare it with static standing alignment.MethodsThirty-four knees (9 females, 8 males; mean age 73.2 years) were assessed using single-plane X-ray fluoroscopy and a 3D to two-dimensional (2D) image matching technique. Alignment during stance phase and standing was evaluated in a world coordinate system, using the direction of gravity and frontal X-ray (aligned with the gait direction) as references.ResultsCompared to standing, the femur (3.5°), tibia (3.2°) and tibial joint line relative to the floor (3.3°) exhibited increased lateral inclination during stance phase (p < 0.01). In the transverse plane, the femur showed a significant increase in external rotation during stance phase (5.0°, p < 0.01) compared to standing, with no significant difference in tibial rotation.ConclusionLower extremity alignment significantly differs between static standing and gait, making it challenging to accurately infer the alignment during gait from standing assessments. This approach offers a practical means for assessing functional lower extremity alignment, potentially improving clinical outcomes in realignment surgeries.