BRCA Variants Do Not Increase the Risk of Adverse Reactions in Patients With Ovarian Cancer: A Single-Center Real-World Study
Objective To study the correlation between BRCA mutation status and the risk of adverse reactions in patients with ovarian cancer. Method A real-world study was conducted at the largest gynecological oncology center in western China, the West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University. T...
Saved in:
Published in | Frontiers in oncology Vol. 12; p. 807748 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Frontiers Media S.A
30.06.2022
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Objective
To study the correlation between
BRCA
mutation status and the risk of adverse reactions in patients with ovarian cancer.
Method
A real-world study was conducted at the largest gynecological oncology center in western China, the West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University. The research subjects were patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer who were initially treated in our hospital from January 2016 to January 2020 and had their
BRCA
gene status evaluated. Multivariate Cox analysis was conducted to investigate the correlation between the
BRCA
mutation status and adverse reactions in ovarian cancer patients during initial treatment.
Results
A total of 349 ovarian cancer patients were enrolled, including 79 patients with pathogenic
BRCA
variants, resulting in a pathogenic mutation rate of 22.6%. Among these 79 patients, 57 had
BRCA1
variants and 22 had
BRCA2
variants, yielding a pathogenic mutation rate of 16.3% and 6.3%, respectively. Multivariate COX analysis revealed that pathogenic
BRCA
variants were not related to the risk of adverse reactions, such as myelosuppression and allergies to chemotherapy drugs (
P
>0.05), during the initial treatment of ovarian cancer.
Conclusion
BRCA
variants did not increase the risk of adverse reactions, such as myelosuppression and allergies to chemotherapy drugs, in ovarian cancer patients during initial treatment. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Reviewed by: Athina Christopoulou, General University Hospital of Patras, Greece; Steven Narod, University of Toronto, Canada; Christine Garcia, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco Medical Center, United States Edited by: Sophia George, University of Miami, United States These authors have contributed equally to this work This article was submitted to Gynecological Oncology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology |
ISSN: | 2234-943X 2234-943X |
DOI: | 10.3389/fonc.2022.807748 |