Investigating the Dimensionality of Counterproductive Work Behavior

The study investigated the dimensionality of counterproductive work behavior (CWB) by examining the relationships between various counterproductive behaviors. Utilizing a university alumni sample (N = 343), data was collected through both self–report and direct judgments of the likelihood of co–occu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of selection and assessment Vol. 11; no. 1; pp. 30 - 42
Main Authors Gruys, Melissa L., Sackett, Paul R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK and Boston, USA Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.03.2003
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The study investigated the dimensionality of counterproductive work behavior (CWB) by examining the relationships between various counterproductive behaviors. Utilizing a university alumni sample (N = 343), data was collected through both self–report and direct judgments of the likelihood of co–occurrence. Eleven categories of CWB were examined: (1) Theft and Related Behavior; (2) Destruction of Property; (3) Misuse of Information; (4) Misuse of Time and Resources; (5) Unsafe Behavior; (6) Poor Attendance; (7) Poor Quality Work; (8) Alcohol Use; (9) Drug Use; (10) Inappropriate Verbal Actions; and (11) Inappropriate Physical Actions. CWB items and categories were generally positively related. Multidimensional scaling analysis suggests that the CWB categories vary on two dimensions: an Interpersonal–Organizational dimension and a Task Relevance dimension.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-FC0NVQ50-4
istex:C2CA247D18670F65199184B1DD6BD488EBFF7DE0
ArticleID:IJSA224
ISSN:0965-075X
1468-2389
DOI:10.1111/1468-2389.00224