Investigating the Dimensionality of Counterproductive Work Behavior
The study investigated the dimensionality of counterproductive work behavior (CWB) by examining the relationships between various counterproductive behaviors. Utilizing a university alumni sample (N = 343), data was collected through both self–report and direct judgments of the likelihood of co–occu...
Saved in:
Published in | International journal of selection and assessment Vol. 11; no. 1; pp. 30 - 42 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK and Boston, USA
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.03.2003
|
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The study investigated the dimensionality of counterproductive work behavior (CWB) by examining the relationships between various counterproductive behaviors. Utilizing a university alumni sample (N = 343), data was collected through both self–report and direct judgments of the likelihood of co–occurrence. Eleven categories of CWB were examined: (1) Theft and Related Behavior; (2) Destruction of Property; (3) Misuse of Information; (4) Misuse of Time and Resources; (5) Unsafe Behavior; (6) Poor Attendance; (7) Poor Quality Work; (8) Alcohol Use; (9) Drug Use; (10) Inappropriate Verbal Actions; and (11) Inappropriate Physical Actions. CWB items and categories were generally positively related. Multidimensional scaling analysis suggests that the CWB categories vary on two dimensions: an Interpersonal–Organizational dimension and a Task Relevance dimension. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/WNG-FC0NVQ50-4 istex:C2CA247D18670F65199184B1DD6BD488EBFF7DE0 ArticleID:IJSA224 |
ISSN: | 0965-075X 1468-2389 |
DOI: | 10.1111/1468-2389.00224 |