Sprint Assessment Using Machine Learning and a Wearable Accelerometer
Field-based sprint performance assessments rely on metrics derived from a simple model of sprinting dynamics parameterized by 2 constants, v and τ, which indicate a sprinter's maximal theoretical velocity and the time it takes to approach v , respectively. This study aims to automate sprint ass...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of applied biomechanics p. 1 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
01.04.2019
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get more information |
ISSN | 1543-2688 |
DOI | 10.1123/jab.2018-0107 |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Field-based sprint performance assessments rely on metrics derived from a simple model of sprinting dynamics parameterized by 2 constants, v
and τ, which indicate a sprinter's maximal theoretical velocity and the time it takes to approach v
, respectively. This study aims to automate sprint assessment by estimating v
and τ using machine learning and accelerometer data. To this end, photocells recorded 10-m split times of 28 subjects for three 40-m sprints while wearing an accelerometer around the waist. Features extracted from the accelerometer data were used to train a classifier to identify the sprint start and regression models to estimate the sprint model parameters. Estimates of v
, τ, and 30-m sprint time (t
) were compared between the proposed method and a photocell method using root mean square error and Bland-Altman analysis. The root mean square error of the sprint start estimate was .22 seconds and ranged from .52 to .93 m/s for v
, .14 to .17 seconds for τ, and .23 to .34 seconds for t
. Model-derived sprint performance metrics from most regression models were significantly (P < .01) correlated with t
. Comparison of the proposed method and a physics-based method suggests pursuit of a combined approach because their strengths appear to complement each other. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1543-2688 |
DOI: | 10.1123/jab.2018-0107 |