Sprint Assessment Using Machine Learning and a Wearable Accelerometer

Field-based sprint performance assessments rely on metrics derived from a simple model of sprinting dynamics parameterized by 2 constants, v and τ, which indicate a sprinter's maximal theoretical velocity and the time it takes to approach v , respectively. This study aims to automate sprint ass...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of applied biomechanics p. 1
Main Authors Gurchiek, Reed D, Rupasinghe Arachchige Don, Hasthika S, Pelawa Watagoda, Lasanthi C R, McGinnis, Ryan S, van Werkhoven, Herman, Needle, Alan R, McBride, Jeffrey M, Arnholt, Alan T
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.04.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information
ISSN1543-2688
DOI10.1123/jab.2018-0107

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Field-based sprint performance assessments rely on metrics derived from a simple model of sprinting dynamics parameterized by 2 constants, v and τ, which indicate a sprinter's maximal theoretical velocity and the time it takes to approach v , respectively. This study aims to automate sprint assessment by estimating v and τ using machine learning and accelerometer data. To this end, photocells recorded 10-m split times of 28 subjects for three 40-m sprints while wearing an accelerometer around the waist. Features extracted from the accelerometer data were used to train a classifier to identify the sprint start and regression models to estimate the sprint model parameters. Estimates of v , τ, and 30-m sprint time (t ) were compared between the proposed method and a photocell method using root mean square error and Bland-Altman analysis. The root mean square error of the sprint start estimate was .22 seconds and ranged from .52 to .93 m/s for v , .14 to .17 seconds for τ, and .23 to .34 seconds for t . Model-derived sprint performance metrics from most regression models were significantly (P < .01) correlated with t . Comparison of the proposed method and a physics-based method suggests pursuit of a combined approach because their strengths appear to complement each other.
ISSN:1543-2688
DOI:10.1123/jab.2018-0107