Integrated poultry-fish farming system encourages multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria dissemination in pond environment and fishes

A poultry-fish farming system provides an opportunity for farmers to feed fishes on a low monetary cost level by utilising poultry droppings. Wastes from poultry, majorly bird excreta, which may contain pathogenic or antibiotic-resistant bacteria, are usually released into ponds to feed fishes. This...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAquaculture Vol. 548; p. 737558
Main Authors Adeyemi, Folasade M., Ojo, Olabisi O., Badejo, Anthony A., Oyedara, Omotayo O., Olaitan, Janet O., Adetunji, Charles O., Hefft, Daniel I., Ogunjobi, Adeniyi A., Akinde, Sunday B.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 15.02.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A poultry-fish farming system provides an opportunity for farmers to feed fishes on a low monetary cost level by utilising poultry droppings. Wastes from poultry, majorly bird excreta, which may contain pathogenic or antibiotic-resistant bacteria, are usually released into ponds to feed fishes. This study focused on the physicochemical analysis of pond water samples and determination of antibiotic resistance pattern of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria isolated from poultry droppings, pond water, and fishes collected from two integrated poultry-fish farms in Osun State, Nigeria. Physicochemical analysis of the pond water samples from the farms revealed higher levels of turbidity (farm A = 580.78 ± 297.7 NTU and farm B = 1162.25 ± 19.23 NTU), total dissolved solids (farm A = 391.9 ± 36.47 mg/L and farm B = 803.65 ± 61.26 mg/L), biochemical oxygen demand (farm A = 23.73 ± 1.24 mg/L and farm B = 28.86 ± 0.94 mg/L), chemical oxygen demand (farm A = 35.59 ± 1.86 mg/L and farm B = 43.29 ± 1.46 mg/L), phosphate (farm A = 3.638 ± 0.25 mg/L and farm B = 3.54 ± 0.26 mg/L), iron (farm A = 2.64 ± 0.42 mg/L and farm B = 9.11 ± 3.48 mg/L), and manganese (farm A = 0.43 ± 0.04 and farm B = 0.66 ± 0.21 mg/L) compared to the permissible limits. Out of eighty Gram-negative bacteria isolated, 55 (68.75%) exhibited MDR phenotypes. These include 32 (58.2%) and 15 (27.3%) bacteria isolated on both farms from poultry dropping and fish samples, respectively. Meanwhile, 8 (14.5%) bacteria were isolated from water samples collected from farm B only. The multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) index on both farms ranged from 0.37 to 1.00. Microbact™ 24E identified the MDR bacteria as members of the genera Aeromonas (21.82%), Burkholderia (16.36%), Pseudomonas (14.55%), Enterobacter (10.91%), Acinetobacter (9.09%), Moraxella (5.45%), Serratia (5.45%), Escherichia (5.45%), Proteus (3.64%), Citrobacter (1.82%), Stenotrophomonas (1.82%), Hafnia (1.82%) and Cronobacter (1.82%). Five of all the MDR bacterial isolates, which include Enterobacter agglomerans (n = 2), Burkholderia pseudomallei (n = 2), and Aeromonas hydrophilia (n = 1), were resistant to all the antibiotics tested. Meanwhile, four bacterial isolates, which include Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 2), Serratia marcescens (n = 1), and Citrobacter youngae (n = 1), were resistant to all classes of antibiotics tested. Strains of E. agglomerans, B. pseudomallei, and Aeromonas hydrophilia isolated from poultry droppings and fishes have the same antibiotype patterns. This shows the interaction between poultry and pond environments relating to the spread of antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains from poultry droppings to fish. The outcome of the study provides baseline information for future studies to understand the possible impact of integrated poultry-fish farming in matters of public health concerns such as food safety, dissemination of pathogens, and antibiotic resistance. •Poultry-fish farming in Nigeria.•First systematic study investigating multidrug resistant bacteria occurrence and quantities in these farms.•Highlighting the risks from present Enterobacteriaceae.•Suggestion of farm design optimisation.
ISSN:0044-8486
1873-5622
DOI:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.737558