Farm and personal characteristics of the clientele of a community-based animal-health service programme in northern Malawi

• Published in: Tropical animal health and production Vol. 33; no. 3; pp. 201 - 218
• Main Authors: Hüttner, K, Leidl, K, Pfeiffer, D U, Jere, F B, Kasambara, D
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Springer Nature B.V 01.05.2001
• Subjects: Adult; Agricultural practices; Animal Diseases - prevention & control; Animal husbandry; Animal Husbandry - statistics & numerical data; Animals; Cattle; Chickens; Crop yield; Demography; Education; Farmers; Farms; Female; Goats; Humans; Income; Livestock; Malawi - epidemiology; Male; Middle Aged; Poverty; Residential areas; Sheep; Surveys and Questionnaires; Veterinary Medicine - organization & administration; Malawi
• ISSN: 0049-4747; 1573-7438
• DOI: 10.1023/A:1010362704698

The social background, farm characteristics, indicators of income and self-evaluation returns of 96 randomly selected users of a Basic Animal Health Service (BAHS) programme in northern Malawi were compared with those of 96 matched past-users and 96 non-users, respectively. All 288 farms were visited between July and October 1997. Data analysis was performed using univariate and multivariate techniques. The results showed that, on average, BAHS users had larger cattle herds (16.3) than part-users (14.7) or non-users (12.4). Similarly, the annual yields of crops were higher for users compared to either of the other groups. Users occupied better houses and owned a larger number of farm and household items than did part-users or non-users. A third of all farmers were engaged in additional income generation to lessen the risk of poverty. However, analysis of the livestock management and the educational background of the farmers suggested that usage of the BAHS programme was not only determined by already existing 'wealth'. Improved livestock husbandry and management measures, which do not require capital investment, were more frequently applied by users compared to either of the other groups. Non-users and part-users had attained a lower level of education, were less open towards improved farming methods and felt less knowledgeable than BAHS users. The average straight-line distances from farms using BAHS to their respective village animal health worker (2.2 km) or veterinary assistant (2.9 km) were similar but varied according to ecological zone. Intensified extension and awareness meetings in villages will be required to get more non-users involved in BAHS.