Prediction of cutting tool wear, surface roughness and vibration of work piece in boring of AISI 316 steel with artificial neural network

•A Laser Doppler Vibrometer (LDV) was used to obtain online data acquisition of work piece vibration.•Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) analyzer used to transform the acousto-optic emission (AOE) signals into frequency domain.•Artificial neural network used to predict surface roughness, tool wear and wor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMeasurement : journal of the International Measurement Confederation Vol. 51; pp. 63 - 70
Main Authors Venkata Rao, K., Murthy, B.S.N., Mohan Rao, N.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.05.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•A Laser Doppler Vibrometer (LDV) was used to obtain online data acquisition of work piece vibration.•Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) analyzer used to transform the acousto-optic emission (AOE) signals into frequency domain.•Artificial neural network used to predict surface roughness, tool wear and work piece vibrations. Machining of stainless steel is difficult due to their hardening tendency. In boring of stainless steels, tool wear and surface roughness are affected by vibration of boring bar. In this paper, tool wear, surface roughness and vibration of work piece were studied in boring of AISI 316 steel with cemented carbide tool inserts. A Laser Doppler Vibrometer was used for online data acquisition of work piece vibration and a high-speed Fast Fourier Transform analyzer was used to process the acousto optic emission signals for the work piece vibration. Experimental data was collected and imported to artificial neural network techniques. A multilayer perceptron model was used with back-propagation algorithm using the input parameters of nose radius, cutting speed, feed and volume of material removed. The artificial neural network was used to predict surface roughness, tool wear and amplitude of work piece vibration. The predicted values were compared with the collected experimental data and percentage error was computed.
ISSN:0263-2241
1873-412X
DOI:10.1016/j.measurement.2014.01.024