Further evaluation of the effects of motivating operations on preference assessment outcomes

The abative effects of a 10-min period of free access to a participant's most preferred edible on preference assessment outcomes was examined using a multielement design with three individuals diagnosed with autism. Four moderately preferred edible items were identified for each participant; ac...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inResearch in autism spectrum disorders Vol. 3; no. 3; pp. 660 - 669
Main Authors Chappell, Nick, Graff, Richard B., Libby, Myrna E., Ahearn, William H.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.07.2009
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The abative effects of a 10-min period of free access to a participant's most preferred edible on preference assessment outcomes was examined using a multielement design with three individuals diagnosed with autism. Four moderately preferred edible items were identified for each participant; access to these edibles was then regulated throughout the study, to control for the number of edibles consumed. Four-item paired stimulus preference assessments were then conducted, under four treatment conditions. A control condition, which involved conducting four-item paired stimulus assessments, was used to determine baseline levels of preference for each edible. Preference assessments conducted under the other three treatment conditions were preceded by a 10-min period of free access to the participant's most preferred edible. The immediate condition involved conducting preference assessments immediately following the 10-min free-access period. The 10-min delay condition and the 20-min delay condition involved conducting preference assessments following a 10-min or 20-min delay after the free access period. For two participants, 10-min of free access to a preferred edible immediately prior to a preference assessment altered the probability of selecting that stimulus, but as the delay between the free-access period and the preference assessment increased, the abative effects became less apparent. For the third participant, preference did not change when assessments were immediately conducted following the 10-min period of free access. Implications of the study are discussed.
ISSN:1750-9467
1878-0237
DOI:10.1016/j.rasd.2009.01.002