An improved method for risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis of aircraft engine rotor blades

• Published in: Engineering failure analysis Vol. 26; pp. 164 - 174
• Main Authors: Su, Xiaoyan, Deng, Yong, Mahadevan, Sankaran, Bao, Qilian
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Ltd 01.12.2012
• Subjects: Engine rotor blade; Evidence theory; Failure modes and effects analysis; Risk priority number; Engine rotor blade; Evidence theory; Failure modes and effects analysis; Risk priority number
• ISSN: 1350-6307; 1873-1961
• DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2012.07.009

► Some drawbacks of Yang et al.’s method are discussed. ► An improved method which adds a process to the construction of BBA is proposed. ► Several examples and an application are illustrated. ► The experimental results show the flexibility and reasonability in real applications. Dempster–Shafer (D–S) evidence theory has been previously introduced in failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) due to its effectiveness and flexibility in dealing with uncertain and subjective information. This study applies the modified D–S evidence theory to obtain the risk priority evaluation of failure modes by aggregating different opinions of experts which may be imprecise and uncertain. However, when experts give different and precise values of the risk evaluation factors, the basic belief assignments (BBAs) become highly conflicting evidence that cannot be fused by Dempster’s combination rule. In this paper, we propose an improved method to construct the basic belief assignments (BBAs) for risk evaluation. We illustrate several examples and use the modified method to deal with the risk priority evaluation of the failure modes of rotor blades of an aircraft engine. The results show that the proposed approach is more flexible and reasonable for real applications.