Determination of serum aflatoxin B1-lysine to evaluate the efficacy of an aflatoxin-adsorbing feed additive in pigs fed an aflatoxin B1-contaminated diet

In this study, serum aflatoxin B 1 (AFB 1 )-lysine was determined in order to evaluate the in vivo efficacy of a hydrated sodium calcium aluminosilicate (HSCAS) in pigs fed AFB 1 . Twenty-four 49-day-old crossbred barrows were maintained in individual cages and allowed ad libitum access to feed and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMycotoxin research Vol. 33; no. 2; pp. 93 - 102
Main Authors Di Gregorio, Mayra Carraro, Jager, Alessandra Vincenzi, Souto, Pollyana Cristina Maggio Castro, Costa, Aline Alves, Rottinghaus, George Edwin, Passarelli, Danielle, Budiño, Fabio Enrique Lemos, Corassin, Carlos Humberto, Oliveira, Carlos Augusto Fernandes
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.05.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In this study, serum aflatoxin B 1 (AFB 1 )-lysine was determined in order to evaluate the in vivo efficacy of a hydrated sodium calcium aluminosilicate (HSCAS) in pigs fed AFB 1 . Twenty-four 49-day-old crossbred barrows were maintained in individual cages and allowed ad libitum access to feed and water. A completely randomized design was used with six animals assigned to each of four dietary treatments for 21 days as follows: (A) basal diet (BD), (B) BD supplemented with 0.5 % HSCAS, (C) BD supplemented with 1.1 mg/kg AFB 1 , and (D) BD supplemented with 0.5 % HSCAS and 1.1 mg/kg AFB 1 . HSCAS was able to alleviate the toxic effects of AFB 1 on pigs and reduce ( P  < 0.05) the levels of serum AFB 1 -lysine. Cumulative reductions of adduct yield values, calculated through the equation [(pg AFB 1 -lysine/mg albumin) / (μg AFB 1 /kg body weight)], were 53.0, 62.8, and 72.1 after 7, 14, and 21 days of oral exposure, respectively. AFB 1 -lysine has potential as an AFB 1 -specific biomarker for diagnostic purposes and for evaluating the efficacy of chemoprotective interventions in pigs.
ISSN:0178-7888
1867-1632
DOI:10.1007/s12550-016-0267-5