Insomnia Characterization: From Hypnogram to Graph Spectral Theory

Objective: To quantify and differentiate control and insomnia sleep onset patterns through biomedical signal processing of overnight polysomnograms. Methods: The approach consisted of three tandem modules: 1) biosignal processing module, which used state-space time-varying autoregressive moving aver...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE transactions on biomedical engineering Vol. 63; no. 10; pp. 2211 - 2219
Main Authors Chaparro-Vargas, Ramiro, Ahmed, Beena, Wessel, Niels, Penzel, Thomas, Cvetkovic, Dean
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States IEEE 01.10.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0018-9294
1558-2531
1558-2531
DOI10.1109/TBME.2016.2515261

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective: To quantify and differentiate control and insomnia sleep onset patterns through biomedical signal processing of overnight polysomnograms. Methods: The approach consisted of three tandem modules: 1) biosignal processing module, which used state-space time-varying autoregressive moving average (TVARMA) processes with recursive particle filter, 2) hypnogram generation module that implemented a fuzzy inference system (F'S), and 3) insomnia characterization module that discriminated between control and subjects with insomnia using a logistic regression model trained with a set of similarity measures (d 1 , d 2 , d 3 , d 4 ). The study employed sleep onset periods from 16 control and 16 subjects with insomnia. Results: Statespaced TVARMA processes with recursive particle filtering provided resilience to nonlinear, nonstationary, and non-Gaussian conditions of biosignals. F'S managed automated sleep scoring robust to intersubjects' and interraters' variability. The similarity distances quantified in a scalar measure the transitions amongst sleep onset stages, computed from expert and automated hypnograms. A statistical set of unpaired two-tailed t-tests suggested that distances d 1 , d 2 , and d 3 had larger statistical significance (p d 1 <; 6.5 × 10 -5 , p d 2 <; 2.1 × 10 -4 , p d 3 <; 4.5 × 10 -7 ) to characterize sleeping patterns. The logistic regression model classified control and subjects with insomnia with sensitivity 87%, specificity 75%, and accuracy 81%. Conclusion: Our approach can perform a supportive role in either biosignal processing, sleep staging, insomnia characterization, or all the previous, coping with time-consuming procedures and massive data volumes of standard protocols. Significance: The introduction of graph spectral theory and logistic regression for the diagnosis of insomnia represents a novel concept, attempting to describe complex sleep dynamics throughout transitions networks and scalar measures.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0018-9294
1558-2531
1558-2531
DOI:10.1109/TBME.2016.2515261