Cardiac electrophysiology, structure and diastolic function in patients with diabetic foot versus those without diabetic foot

• Published in: Journal of diabetes investigation Vol. 15; no. 9; pp. 1276 - 1286
• Main Authors: Bai, Mingxin, Chen, Dawei, Liu, Yan, Ran, Xingwu, Wang, Chun, Chen, Lihong, Yan, Donge, He, Sen, Wu, Murong, Luo, Bo, Wang, Wen, Lei, Zhiyi, Gao, Yun
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Richmond John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.09.2024; Wiley
• Subjects: Atherosclerosis; Autonomic nervous system; Cardiac arrhythmia; Cardiovascular disease; Cerebrovascular disease; Confounding (Statistics); Coronary vessels; Diabetes; Diabetes mellitus; Diabetic foot; Doppler effect; Echocardiography; EKG; Electrocardiography; Electrophysiology; Feet; Foot diseases; Heart attacks; Heart rate; Heart rate variability; Ischemia; Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction; Mortality; Multivariate analysis; Sensitivity analysis; Septum; Standard deviation; Statistical analysis; Structure-function relationships; United States > US; China
• ISSN: 2040-1116; 2040-1124; 2040-1124
• DOI: 10.1111/jdi.14250

Aims/Introduction To evaluate the differences in cardiac autonomic function, cardiac structure and diastolic function between individuals with diabetic foot (DF) and those with diabetes but without DF. Materials and Methods A total of 413 individuals with DF and 437 without DF who underwent a 24‐h electrocardiogram Holter and a Doppler echocardiogram were included. The heart rate variability parameters to evaluate cardiac autonomic function, and the indices for the assessment of cardiac structure and left ventricular (LV) diastolic function, including left atrium, LV posterior wall thickness, interventricular septum and E/e′ ratio, were measured or calculated. Propensity score matching was used for the sensitivity analysis to minimize potential imbalance. Results In both the crude and propensity score matching analyses, significant differences were observed in heart rate variability between individuals with and without DF, as evidenced by lower standard deviation of the normal sinus interval, lower low‐frequency power/high‐frequency power ratio, lower standard deviation of the 5‐min average RR intervals, lower low‐frequency power, lower percentage of normal adjacent RR interval difference >50 ms, lower root mean square of successive RR interval differences and lower high‐frequency power (all P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, DF showed an independent negative correlation with the aforementioned indices of heart rate variability (all P < 0.05). Individuals with DF showed higher left atrium, LV posterior wall thickness, interventricular septum and a higher E/e′ ratio than those without DF in the crude analysis (all P < 0.05), whereas these indices were no longer associated with DF in the multivariate analysis and the propensity score matching analyses. Conclusions Cardiac autonomic modulation was more severely impaired in individuals with DF than in their counterparts without DF. There has been insufficient evidence to demonstrate the independent association of DF and LV diastolic dysfunction. We analyzed the heart rate variability parameters, and the indices for the assessment of cardiac structure and left ventricular diastolic function to evaluate the differences in cardiac autonomic function, cardiac structure and diastolic function between individuals with diabetic foot (DF) and those with diabetes, but without DF. We concluded that cardiac autonomic modulation was more severely impaired in individuals with DF than in their counterparts without DF.