Free space optic channel monitoring using machine learning

• Published in: Optics express Vol. 29; no. 7; pp. 10967 - 10981
• Main Authors: Esmail, Maged A, Saif, Waddah S, Ragheb, Amr M, Alshebeili, Saleh A
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 29.03.2021
• ISSN: 1094-4087; 1094-4087
• DOI: 10.1364/OE.416777

Free space optic (FSO) is a type of optical communication where the signal is transmitted in free space instead of fiber cables. Because of this, the signal is subject to different types of impairments that affect its quality. Predicting these impairments help in automatic system diagnosis and building adaptive optical networks. Using machine learning for predicting the signal impairments in optical networks has been extensively covered during the past few years. However, for FSO links, the work is still in its infancy. In this paper, we consider predicting three channel parameters in FSO links that are related to amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) noise, turbulence, and pointing errors. To the best of authors knowledge, this work is the first to consider predicting FSO channel parameters under the effect of more than one impairment. First, we report the performance of predicting the FSO parameters using asynchronous amplitude histogram (AAH) and asynchronous delay-tap sampling (ADTS) histogram features. The results show that ADTS histogram features provide better prediction accuracy. Second, we compare the performance of support vector machine (SVM) regressor and convolutional neural network (CNN) regressor using ADTS histogram features. The results show that CNN regressor outperforms SVM regressor for some cases, while for other cases they have similar performance. Finally, we investigate the capability of CNN regressor for predicting the channel parameters for three different transmission speeds. The results show that the CNN regressor has good performance for predicting the OSNR parameter regardless of the value of transmission speed. However, for the turbulence and pointing errors, the prediction under low speed transmission is more accurate than under high speed transmission.