In the Face of Opportunities: Facial Structures of Scientists Shape Expectations of STEM Environments

• Published in: Personality & social psychology bulletin Vol. 49; no. 5; pp. 673 - 691
• Main Authors: Joshi, Mansi P., Lloyd, E. Paige, Diekman, Amanda B., Hugenberg, Kurt
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.05.2023; SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
• Subjects: Advisors; College faculty; Engineering - education; Goals; Humans; Impressions; Mathematics; Motivation; Perceptions; Science and technology; Technology - education; Technology attitudes; face perception; communality; organizational trust; goals; STEM
• ISSN: 0146-1672; 1552-7433
• DOI: 10.1177/01461672221077801

Impressions of role leaders provide information about anticipated opportunities in a role, and these perceptions can influence attitudes about science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) pathways. Specifically, the facial structures of role leaders influenced perceived affordances of working with that person, such as the availability of communal and agentic opportunities (e.g., mentorship; achievement). STEM faculty with trustworthy (relative to dominant) faces were seen as valuing communal goals (Studies 1–3), and in turn, perceived as affording both communal and agentic opportunities in their research groups (Studies 2–3b). These heightened goal opportunities aligned with perceptions that trustworthy-faced advisors would enact more group-supportive behaviors (Study 2). Consequently, students anticipated fairer treatment and reported greater interest in labs directed by trustworthy- than dominant-faced leaders (Studies 3a–4a), even when images were accompanied by explicit information about leaders’ collaborative behavior (Study 4b). The faces of leaders can thus function as the “face” of that role and the surrounding culture.