Experiences of dialogue in advance care planning educational programs

• Published in: Nursing ethics Vol. 31; no. 4; pp. 493 - 507
• Main Authors: Kato, Hiroki, Iwasaki, Takako, Ko, Ayako, Nishina, Yuko, Tanigaki, Shizuko, Norikoshi, Chie, Sakai, Masako, Ito, Mari, Harasawa, Nozomi, Tamura, Keiko, Nagae, Hiroko
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London, England SAGE Publications 01.06.2024; SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
• Subjects: Adult; Advance Care Planning - standards; Advance directives; Aged; Care plans; Communication; Content analysis; Educational programs; End of life decisions; Ethical dilemmas; Ethics; Female; Focus groups; Focus Groups - methods; Health education; Hospice care; Humans; Interviews; Japan; Male; Medical treatment; Middle Aged; Qualitative Research; Storytelling; Talking; Values; Japan; qualitative design; advance care planning; education program; value; focus group; dialogue
• ISSN: 0969-7330; 1477-0989; 1477-0989
• DOI: 10.1177/09697330231166086

Background Advance care planning (ACP) is a process in which adults engage in an ongoing dialogue about future medical treatment and care. Though ACP is recommended to improve the quality of end-of-life care, the details of the dialogue experience in ACP are unknown. Objective To explore participants’ experiences of dialogue in an ACP educational program that encouraged them to discuss the value of a way of life. Research design This qualitative descriptive study used the focus group interview method. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Participants and research context A dialogue-based ACP educational program was conducted in four regions in Japan for local citizens to discuss the value of their way of life. A total of 66 individuals (mean age = 55.5 ± 17.2 years; 50 women and 16 men) participated in focus group interviews. Ethical considerations This study was approved by the Ethical Review Committee of Tokyo Women’s Medical University (no. 4723) and Kyoto University (no. R2099). Findings Five main themes were extracted: discussing one’s thoughts with others in a considerate manner, reflecting on one’s way of life through others, feeling a sense of connection with others through storytelling, realizing the difficulties of talking about “what if” topics, and turning one’s eyes toward the future through the dialogue. These themes were interrelated and illustrated the complexity of the experience of discussing values. Conclusions The results suggest that dialogue in ACP is useful in clarifying values. They also indicated the need for dealing with the ethical challenges of discussing value and the importance of caring for the interlocutor to have a safe dialogue. In the ACP process, safety in dialogue may improve readiness in ACP, and health practitioners who support ACP need to address the ethical challenges entailing dialogue about values.