Real Time Processing of Affective and Cognitive Stimuli in the Human Brain Extracted from MEG Signals

The magnetoencephalography (MEG) signal was recorded while subjects watched a video containing separate blocks of affective and cognitive advertisements and recalled slides extracted from the video a day later. An earlier behavioural study using the same video material showed that the affective adve...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBrain topography Vol. 13; no. 1; pp. 11 - 19
Main Authors Ioannides, Andreas A., Liu, Lichan, Theofilou, Dionyssios, Dammers, Jürgen, Burne, Tom, Ambler, TimAmbler, Rose, Steven
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Springer Nature B.V 01.10.2000
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0896-0267
1573-6792
DOI10.1023/A:1007878001388

Cover

More Information
Summary:The magnetoencephalography (MEG) signal was recorded while subjects watched a video containing separate blocks of affective and cognitive advertisements and recalled slides extracted from the video a day later. An earlier behavioural study using the same video material showed that the affective advertisements were better recalled and that administration of propranolol (a beta-adrenergic blocker) abolished this effect. Magnetic field tomography (MFT) was used to extract tomographic estimates of activity millisecond by millisecond from the continuous MEG signal. Statistically significant differences between affective and cognitive blocks were identified in posterior and prefrontal areas. Cognitive blocks produced stronger activity in posterior parietal areas and superior prefrontal cortex in all three subjects. Affective blocks modulated activity in orbitofrontal and retrosplenial cortex, amygdala and brainstem. Individual contributions to the statistical maps were traced in real time from milliseconds to many seconds. Time-locked responses from the recall session were used to compare average and single trial MFT solutions and to combine activations from all subjects into a common anatomical space. The last step produced statistically significant increases in occipital and inferior ventral cortex between 100 and 200 ms compared to a prestimulus baseline.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0896-0267
1573-6792
DOI:10.1023/A:1007878001388