Friends because of foes: synchronous movement within predator-prey domains

For prey, movement synchrony represents a potent antipredator strategy. Prey, however, must balance the costs and benefits of using conspecifics to mediate risk. Thus, the emergent patterns of risk-driven sociality depend on variation in space and in the predators and prey themselves. We applied the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences Vol. 379; no. 1912; p. 20230374
Main Authors Prokopenko, Christina M, Ellington, E Hance, Robitaille, Alec, Aubin, Jaclyn A, Balluffi-Fry, Juliana, Laforge, Michel, Webber, Quinn M R, Zabihi-Seissan, Sana, Vander Wal, Eric
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England The Royal Society 21.10.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:For prey, movement synchrony represents a potent antipredator strategy. Prey, however, must balance the costs and benefits of using conspecifics to mediate risk. Thus, the emergent patterns of risk-driven sociality depend on variation in space and in the predators and prey themselves. We applied the concept of predator-prey habitat domain, the space in which animals acquire food resources, to test the conditions under which individuals synchronize their movements relative to predator and prey habitat domains. We tested the response of movement synchrony of prey to predator-prey domains in two populations of ungulates that vary in their gregariousness and predator community: (i) elk, which are preyed on by wolves; and (ii) caribou, which are preyed on by coyotes and black bears. Prey in both communities responded to cursorial predators by increasing synchrony during seasons of greater predation pressure. Elk moved more synchronously in the wolf habitat domain during winter and caribou moved more synchronously in the coyote habitat domains during spring. In the winter, caribou increased movement synchrony when coyote and caribou domains overlapped. By integrating habitat domains with movement ecology, we provide a compelling argument for social behaviours and collective movement as an antipredator response. This article is part of the theme issue 'The spatial-social interface: A theoretical and empirical integration'.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
One contribution of 14 to a theme issue ‘The spatial–social interface: a theoretical and empirical integration’.
Electronic supplementary material is available online at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.7425758.
Christina M. Prokopenko and E. Hance Ellington are joint first authors.
ISSN:0962-8436
1471-2970
1471-2970
DOI:10.1098/rstb.2023.0374