Clinical efficacy of centrifugal-membranous hybrid double filtration plasmapheresis and membranous double filtration plasmapheresis on severe lupus nephritis

Objective The study delves into the clinical efficacy and safety of centrifugal-membranous hybrid double filtration plasmapheresis (C/M hybrid DFPP) on severe lupus nephritis (LN) by comparing it with membranous DFPP (M DFPP). Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted in 70 patients who wer...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inLupus Vol. 32; no. 9; pp. 1066 - 1074
Main Authors Dong, Jianhua, Huang, Li, Li, Chuan, WU, Bian, Yang, Xi, Ge, Yongchun
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England SAGE Publications 01.08.2023
Sage Publications Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective The study delves into the clinical efficacy and safety of centrifugal-membranous hybrid double filtration plasmapheresis (C/M hybrid DFPP) on severe lupus nephritis (LN) by comparing it with membranous DFPP (M DFPP). Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted in 70 patients who were diagnosed with severe LN and had received DFPP treatment. Results A total of 181 DFPPs were performed, including 133 C/M hybrid DFPPs (51 patients) and 48 M DFPPs (19 patients).The ANA, A-dsDNA titer, quantitative urinary protein, and serum creatinine decreased significantly and hemoglobin increased significantly after the DFPP treatment and at third month after treatment. Two patients in the M DFPP group developed bleeding complications, and four patients in the C/M hybrid DFPP group developed perioral numbness. Conclusion Although there was no significant difference in clinical efficacy between C/M hybrid DFPP and M DFPP on severe LN, the risk of bleeding complications was significantly lower in the C/M hybrid DFPP group.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0961-2033
1477-0962
DOI:10.1177/09612033231187229