Eye Movement-Related Confounds in Neural Decoding of Visual Working Memory Representations

A relatively new analysis technique, known as neural decoding or multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA), has become increasingly popular for cognitive neuroimaging studies over recent years. These techniques promise to uncover the representational contents of neural signals, as well as the underlying...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published ineNeuro Vol. 5; no. 4; p. ENEURO.0401-17.2018
Main Authors Mostert, Pim, Albers, Anke Marit, Brinkman, Loek, Todorova, Larisa, Kok, Peter, de Lange, Floris P
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Society for Neuroscience 01.07.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A relatively new analysis technique, known as neural decoding or multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA), has become increasingly popular for cognitive neuroimaging studies over recent years. These techniques promise to uncover the representational contents of neural signals, as well as the underlying code and the dynamic profile thereof. A field in which these techniques have led to novel insights in particular is that of visual working memory (VWM). In the present study, we subjected human volunteers to a combined VWM/imagery task while recording their neural signals using magnetoencephalography (MEG). We applied multivariate decoding analyses to uncover the temporal profile underlying the neural representations of the memorized item. Analysis of gaze position however revealed that our results were contaminated by systematic eye movements, suggesting that the MEG decoding results from our originally planned analyses were confounded. In addition to the eye movement analyses, we also present the original analyses to highlight how these might have readily led to invalid conclusions. Finally, we demonstrate a potential remedy, whereby we train the decoders on a functional localizer that was specifically designed to target bottom-up sensory signals and as such avoids eye movements. We conclude by arguing for more awareness of the potentially pervasive and ubiquitous effects of eye movement-related confounds.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Author contributions: A.M.A., L.B., L.T., and F.P.d.L. designed research; A.M.A. and L.T. performed research; P.M. analyzed data; P.M., A.M.A., L.B., P.K., ad F.P.d.L. wrote the paper.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
This work was supported by The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research and the European Research Council [NWO Research Talent Grant 406-13-001 (to P.M.); NWO Brain and Cognition Grant 433-09-248 (to A.M.A. and L.B.); NWO Rubicon Grant 446-15-004 (to P.K.); and NWO Vidi Grant 452-13-016, ERC Starting Grant 678286, and NWO Brain and Cognition Grant 433-09-248 (to F.P.d.L.)].
ISSN:2373-2822
2373-2822
DOI:10.1523/ENEURO.0401-17.2018