The Fifth Vital Sign-What Does It Mean?

Acute pain is reported as a presenting symptom in over 80% of physician visits. Chronic pain affects an estimated 76.2 million Americans—more than diabetes, heart disease, and cancer combined. It has been estimated to be undertreated in up to 80% of patients in some settings. Pain costs the American...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPain practice Vol. 8; no. 6; pp. 417 - 422
Main Authors Walid, Mohammad Sami, Donahue, Stephen N., Darmohray, Dana M., Hyer Jr, Leon A., Robinson Jr, Joe Sam
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Malden, USA Blackwell Publishing Inc 01.11.2008
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Acute pain is reported as a presenting symptom in over 80% of physician visits. Chronic pain affects an estimated 76.2 million Americans—more than diabetes, heart disease, and cancer combined. It has been estimated to be undertreated in up to 80% of patients in some settings. Pain costs the American public more than $100 billion each year in health care, compensation, and litigation. That's why pain was officially declared “The Fifth Vital Sign.” Henceforth the evaluation of pain became a requirement of proper patient care as important and basic as the assessment and management of temperature, blood pressure, respiratory rate, and heart rate. The numeric pain scale certainly has a place in care and in pain management; however, it is important to assess the patient's communication and self‐management style and to recognize that patients, like pain, are on a continuum with varied styles of communication and adaptation. It is easy to get lost in the process, even when the process is initiated with the best of intentions. In the quest for individualized medicine, it might be best to keep pain assessment in the individualization arena.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-49T6KV6X-Q
istex:055C67C9758EB7A7200EABBF119D1CB4D3AC6B01
ArticleID:PAPR222
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-4
ObjectType-Correction/Retraction-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-2
ObjectType-Article-3
ISSN:1530-7085
1533-2500
DOI:10.1111/j.1533-2500.2008.00222.x