Aroma quality characterization for Pixian broad bean paste fermentation by electronic nose combined with machine learning methods

Pixian broad bean paste (PBP) is a popular fermentation condiment known in home and abroad. Aroma is a significant index for evaluating PBP quality during fermentation process. Hence, in this study, electronic nose (E-nose) system combined machine learning methods were applied for PBP quality charac...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of food measurement & characterization Vol. 18; no. 5; pp. 3363 - 3377
Main Authors Xu, Min, Wang, Xingbin, Xu, Zedong, Wang, Yao, Jia, Pengfei, ding, Wenwu, Dong, Shirong, Liu, Ping
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer US 01.05.2024
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Pixian broad bean paste (PBP) is a popular fermentation condiment known in home and abroad. Aroma is a significant index for evaluating PBP quality during fermentation process. Hence, in this study, electronic nose (E-nose) system combined machine learning methods were applied for PBP quality characterization. The machine learning methods including partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), partial least squares regression (PLSR), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and artificial neural networks (ANN) were introduced for qualitatively discriminating fermentation time and quantitatively analyzing the contents of key aromas of PBP samples. The PLS-DA result indicated that it is feasible to identify the fermentation stages of PBP samples by E-nose and a classification accuracy of 99% could be achieved. As for the quantitative prediction modelling, ANN exhibited preferable performance than PLSR, SVM and RF for analyzing the contents of phenethyl alcohol (R 2  = 0.846, RMSE = 10.270), isoamyl alcohol (R 2  = 0.940, RMSE = 6.857), 3-methylthiopropanol (R 2  = 0.910, RMSE = 2.205), benzaldehyde (R 2  = 0.824, RMSE = 4.172), furfural (R 2  = 0.902, RMSE = 2.066), 4-ethyl guaiacol (R 2  = 0.877, RMSE = 11.249) and 4-ethylphenol (R 2  = 0.913, RMSE = 12.754).
ISSN:2193-4126
2193-4134
DOI:10.1007/s11694-024-02410-3