Power, Positionality, and the Ethic of Care in Qualitative Research

Building on the definition offered by Aspers and Corte, I argue that qualitative research is not qualitative simply because it encodes for the ability “to get closer” to the phenomenon being studied, so much as it is anchored by a methodological obligation to critically examine how and why that clos...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inQualitative sociology Vol. 44; no. 4; pp. 575 - 581
Main Author Reich, Jennifer A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer US 01.12.2021
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Closeness
Cross Cultural Psychology
Personality and Social Psychology
Positionality
Power
Qualitative research
Reflexivity
Review Essay
Social Sciences
Sociology
Qualitative methods
Ethic of care
Embodiment
Positionality
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Building on the definition offered by Aspers and Corte, I argue that qualitative research is not qualitative simply because it encodes for the ability “to get closer” to the phenomenon being studied, so much as it is anchored by a methodological obligation to critically examine how and why that closeness matters. Qualitative research considers the positionality of both the researcher and the researched as core aspects of inquiry to understand how knowledge and experience are situated, co-constructed, and historically and socially located. This methodological expectation for reflexivity does not just allow for richer data, but also requires researchers to consider power within and surrounding the research process and to employ an ethic of care for their subjects and for the overall work of qualitative research.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0162-0436
1573-7837
DOI:10.1007/s11133-021-09500-4