Perceptive comparison of mean and full field dynamic recrystallization models

Review ofdynamic recrystallization models isthe subject of the present work. Development of both mean field and full field approaches during last three decades is presented and discussed. Conventional mean field models based on closed form equations as well as differential equations are presented fi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inArchives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering Vol. 16; no. 4; pp. 569 - 589
Main Authors Madej, Lukasz, Sitko, Mateusz, Pietrzyk, Maciej
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Springer London 01.09.2016
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Cellular automata
Civil Engineering
Compression tests
Differential equations
Dynamic recrystallization
Engineering
Mathematical models
Mechanical Engineering
Review Article
Structural Materials
Thermal simulators
Mean field models
Full field models
Dynamic recrystallization
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1644-9665
2083-3318
DOI10.1016/j.acme.2016.03.010

Cover

More Information
Summary:Review ofdynamic recrystallization models isthe subject of the present work. Development of both mean field and full field approaches during last three decades is presented and discussed. Conventional mean field models based on closed form equations as well as differential equations are presented first. Then full field models are elaborated focusing on the cellular automata approach as an example. Capabilities as well as limitations and drawbacks of these approaches are highlighted based on the set of case studies. Experimental data for validation of models were obtained from uniaxial compression tests at Gleeble 3800 thermo-mechanical simulator.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1644-9665
2083-3318
DOI:10.1016/j.acme.2016.03.010