The Effect of Multichannel and Channel-Free Hearing Aids on Spectral-Temporal Resolution and Speech Understanding in Noise
Abstract Background Identifying and understanding speech is difficult for individuals with sensorineural hearing loss, especially in noisy environments. Possible causes include less audibility of the signal, impaired temporal resolution, and low selectivity of frequency. The hearing aid is the most...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of the American Academy of Audiology Vol. 33; no. 5; pp. 285 - 292 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc
01.05.2022
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Abstract
Background
Identifying and understanding speech is difficult for individuals with sensorineural hearing loss, especially in noisy environments. Possible causes include less audibility of the signal, impaired temporal resolution, and low selectivity of frequency. The hearing aid is the most common option used to minimize the problems faced by individuals with sensorineural hearing loss.
Purpose
This article investigates the effects of multichannel and channel-free hearing aid signal processing techniques on spectral-temporal resolution and speech understanding in noise.
Research Design
An experimental study was used in which the determined tests were applied to the participants.
Study Sample
Thirty-four individuals with bilateral symmetrical sensorineural hearing loss between the ages of 18 and 70 were included in our study.
Data Collection and Analysis
Spectral-temporally modulated ripple test, random gap detection test (RGDT), and Turkish matrix test were applied to the participants using multichannel and channel-free hearing aids. All the data obtained were compared statistically in terms of the performances of the hearing aids.
Results
There was no significant difference between multichannel and channel-free hearing aids for spectral resolution and speech understanding in noise tests (
p
> 0.05). While there was no significant difference between the two hearing aids for 500 and 4,000 Hz RGDT in temporal resolution measurement (
p
> 0.05), for 1,000 Hz (
p
= 0.045), 2,000 Hz (
p
= 0.046), and composite RGDT (
p
= 0.001), statistically significant better performances were obtained with the channel-free hearing aids.
Conclusion
It is thought that faster processing of the incoming signal in the channel-free hearing aids improves the temporal resolution performance. It is predicted that our study findings might help to determine the signal processing technique that will maximize the communication skills of the patients in various conditions. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1050-0545 2157-3107 |
DOI: | 10.1055/a-1817-6840 |