Analysis of Barrel-Aged Kentucky Bourbon Whiskey by Ultrahigh Resolution Mass Spectrometry

In an effort to characterize differently aged bourbons and to determine whether bourbons could be “fingerprinted” by their chemical compositions, we used Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR MS) and liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFood analytical methods Vol. 13; no. 12; pp. 2301 - 2311
Main Authors Yang, Kundi, Somogyi, Arpad, Thomas, Caitlyn, Zhang, Huan, Cheng, Zishuo, Xu, Shenyuan, Miller, Callie, Spivey, Devin, Blake, Colin, Smith, Clay, Dafoe, David, Danielson, Neil D., Crowder, Michael W.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer US 01.12.2020
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Aging
Analytical Chemistry
Barrels
Chemical composition
Chemical compounds
Chemistry
Chemistry and Materials Science
Chemistry/Food Science
Cyclotron resonance
Fingerprinting
Food Science
Fourier analysis
Fourier transforms
Ions
Liquid chromatography
Mass spectrometry
Mass spectroscopy
Microbiology
Scientific imaging
Spectroscopy
Whiskey
Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance (FT-ICR)
Orbitrap
Mass spectrometry
Bourbon whiskey
Barrel aging
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:In an effort to characterize differently aged bourbons and to determine whether bourbons could be “fingerprinted” by their chemical compositions, we used Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR MS) and liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) to characterize 2 distinct sets of bourbon samples. The first set of bourbons were prepared using the same mash bill but were aged differently (unaged (0 years), 2 years, 4 years, and 6 years) in oak barrels. The results showed an increase in the number of chemical compounds present as the bourbon ages. Most of the large changes in chemical composition occur in the first 2 years of aging. We also analyzed single barrel bourbons, which were produced identically but maturated in different, adjacent barrels, and the results suggested that significant differences exist among these samples. These results suggest that “fingerprinting” of different bourbons for authentication purposes may be complicated and that careful analyses, coupled with more comprehensive identification of chemical compounds in bourbons, are needed.
ISSN:1936-9751
1936-976X
DOI:10.1007/s12161-020-01850-z