Existence and Continuity of Inertial Manifolds for the Hyperbolic Relaxation of the Viscous Cahn–Hilliard Equation
We consider the hyperbolic relaxation of the viscous Cahn–Hilliard equation 0.1 ε ϕ tt + ϕ t - Δ ( δ ϕ t - Δ ϕ + g ( ϕ ) ) = 0 , in a bounded domain of R d with smooth boundary when subject to Neumann boundary conditions, and on rectangular domains when subject to periodic boundary conditions. The s...
Saved in:
Published in | Applied mathematics & optimization Vol. 84; no. 3; pp. 3339 - 3416 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York
Springer US
01.12.2021
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | We consider the hyperbolic relaxation of the viscous Cahn–Hilliard equation
0.1
ε
ϕ
tt
+
ϕ
t
-
Δ
(
δ
ϕ
t
-
Δ
ϕ
+
g
(
ϕ
)
)
=
0
,
in a bounded domain of
R
d
with smooth boundary when subject to Neumann boundary conditions, and on rectangular domains when subject to periodic boundary conditions. The space dimension is
d
=
1
,
2 or 3, but it is required
δ
=
ε
=
0
when
d
=
2
or 3;
δ
being the viscosity parameter. The constant
ε
∈
(
0
,
1
]
is a relaxation parameter,
ϕ
is the order parameter and
g
:
R
→
R
is a nonlinear function. This equation models the early stages of spinodal decomposition in certain glasses. Assuming that
ε
is dominated from above by
δ
when
d
=
2
or 3, we construct a family of exponential attractors for Eq. (
0.1
) which converges as
(
ε
,
δ
)
goes to
(
0
,
δ
0
)
,
for any
δ
0
∈
[
0
,
1
]
,
with respect to a metric that depends only on
ε
, improving previous results where this metric also depends on
δ
. Then we introduce two change of variables and corresponding problems, in the case of rectangular domains and
d
=
1
or 2 only. First, we set
ϕ
~
(
t
)
=
ϕ
(
ε
t
)
and we rewrite Eq. (
0.1
) in the variables
(
ϕ
~
,
ϕ
~
t
)
.
We show that there exist an integer
n
, independent of both
ε
and
δ
, a value
0
<
ε
~
0
(
n
)
≤
1
and an inertial manifold of dimension
n
, for either
ε
∈
(
0
,
ε
~
0
]
and
δ
=
2
ε
or
ε
∈
(
0
,
ε
~
0
]
and
δ
∈
[
0
,
3
ε
]
. Then, we prove the existence of an inertial manifold of dimension that depends on
ε
, but is independent of
δ
and
η
, for any fixed
ε
∈
(
0
,
(
η
-
2
)
2
]
and every
δ
∈
[
ε
,
(
2
-
η
)
ε
]
, for an arbitrary
η
∈
(
1
,
2
)
. Next, we show the existence of an inertial manifold of dimension that depends on
ε
and
η
, but is independent of
δ
, for any fixed
ε
∈
(
0
,
1
(
2
+
η
)
2
]
and every
δ
∈
[
(
2
+
η
)
ε
,
1
]
, where
η
>
0
is arbitrary chosen. Moreover, we show the continuity of the inertial manifolds at
δ
=
δ
0
,
for any
δ
0
∈
[
0
,
(
2
-
η
)
ε
]
∪
[
(
2
+
η
)
ε
,
1
]
. Second, we set
ϕ
t
=
-
(
2
ε
)
-
1
(
I
-
δ
Δ
)
ϕ
+
ε
-
1
/
2
v
and we rewrite Eq. (
0.1
) in the variables
(
ϕ
,
v
)
. Then, we prove the existence of an inertial manifold of dimension that depends on
δ
, but is independent of
ε
,
for any fixed
δ
∈
(
0
,
1
]
and every
ε
∈
(
0
,
3
16
δ
2
]
. In addition, we prove the convergence of the inertial manifolds when
ε
→
0
+
. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ISSN: | 0095-4616 1432-0606 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00245-021-09749-9 |