Effect of the Communities that HEAL intervention on receipt of behavioral therapies for opioid use disorder: A cluster randomized wait-list controlled trial

• Published in: Drug and alcohol dependence Vol. 259; p. 111286
• Main Authors: Glasgow, LaShawn, Douglas, Christian, Sprunger, Joel G., Campbell, Aimee N.C., Chandler, Redonna, Dasgupta, Anindita, Holloway, JaNae, Marks, Katherine R., Roberts, Sara M., Martinez, Linda Sprague, Thompson, Katherine, Weiss, Roger D., Aldridge, Arnie, Asman, Kat, Barbosa, Carolina, Blevins, Derek, Chassler, Deborah, Cogan, Lindsay, Fanucchi, Laura, Hall, Megan E., Hunt, Timothy, Jadovich, Elizabeth, Levin, Frances R., Lincourt, Patricia, Lofwall, Michelle R., Loukas, Vanessa, McAlearney, Ann Scheck, Nunes, Edward, Oga, Emmanuel, Oller, Devin, Rudorf, Maria, Sullivan, Ann Marie, Talbert, Jeffery, Taylor, Angela, Teater, Julie, Vandergrift, Nathan, Woodlock, Kristin, Zarkin, Gary A., Freisthler, Bridget, Samet, Jeffrey H., Walsh, Sharon L., El-Bassel, Nabila
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Ireland Elsevier B.V 01.06.2024
• Subjects: Behavioral health; Community intervention; Medicaid; Opioids; Overdose; Retention; Behavioral health; Overdose; Retention; Medicaid; Opioids; Community intervention
• ISSN: 0376-8716; 1879-0046; 1879-0046
• DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.111286

The U.S. opioid overdose crisis persists. Outpatient behavioral health services (BHS) are essential components of a comprehensive response to opioid use disorder and overdose fatalities. The Helping to End Addiction Long-Term® (HEALing) Communities Study developed the Communities That HEAL (CTH) intervention to reduce opioid overdose deaths in 67 communities in Kentucky, Ohio, New York, and Massachusetts through the implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs), including BHS. This paper compares the rate of individuals receiving outpatient BHS in Wave 1 intervention communities (n = 34) to waitlisted Wave 2 communities (n = 33). Medicaid data included individuals ≥18 years of age receiving any of five BHS categories: intensive outpatient, outpatient, case management, peer support, and case management or peer support. Negative binomial regression models estimated the rate of receiving each BHS for Wave 1 and Wave 2. Effect modification analyses evaluated changes in the effect of the CTH intervention between Wave 1 and Wave 2 by research site, rurality, age, sex, and race/ethnicity. No significant differences were detected between intervention and waitlisted communities in the rate of individuals receiving any of the five BHS categories. None of the interaction effects used to test the effect modification were significant. Several factors should be considered when interpreting results—no significant intervention effects were observed through Medicaid claims data, the best available data source but limited in terms of capturing individuals reached by the intervention. Also, the 12-month evaluation window may have been too brief to see improved outcomes considering the time required to stand-up BHS. Clinical Trials.gov http://www.clinicaltrials.gov: Identifier: NCT04111939 •Evidence-based practices to reduce opioid overdose deaths implemented in 67 communities.•Outpatient behavioral health services are key element of opioid addiction treatment.•Similar receipt of behavioral services in control and intervention communities.•More research needed to test the impact of comprehensive, community-driven interventions.