Current Status of Simulation in Thoracic Surgical Training

• Published in: The Annals of thoracic surgery Vol. 116; no. 5; pp. 1107 - 1115
• Main Authors: Whittaker, George, Ghita, Ioana-Alexandra, Taylor, Marcus, Salmasi, M. Yousuf, Granato, Felice, Athanasiou, Thanos
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands Elsevier Inc 01.11.2023
• ISSN: 0003-4975; 1552-6259
• DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.05.002

Simulation is playing an increasingly important role in surgical training but is not yet a mandatory part of most surgical curricula. A simulator must undergo rigorous validation to verify it as a reliable tool. The aim of this study was to review the literature to identify simulators that are currently available to augment thoracic surgical training and to analyze any evidence supporting or validating them. A literature search of the MEDLINE (1946 to November 2022) and Embase (1947 to November 2022) databases was performed to identify simulators for basic skills and procedures in thoracic surgery. A selection of keywords were used to perform the literature search. After identification of appropriate articles, data were extracted and analyzed. Thirty-three simulators were found in 31 articles. Simulators for basic skills (n = 13) and thoracic lobectomy (n = 13) were most commonly described, followed by miscellaneous (n = 7). Most models were of a hybrid modality (n = 18). Evidence of validity was established in 48.5% (n = 16) of simulators. In total, 15.2% (n = 5) of simulators had 3 or more elements of validity demonstrated, and only 3.0% (n = 1) accomplished full validation. Numerous simulators of varying modality and fidelity exist for a variety of thoracic surgical skills and procedures, although validation evidence is frequently inadequate. Simulation models may be able to provide training in basic surgical and procedural skills; however, further assessment of validity needs to be undertaken before consideration of their integration into training programs.