Ionospheric TEC prediction using Long Short-Term Memory deep learning network

• Published in: Astrophysics and space science Vol. 366; no. 1
• Main Authors: Wen, Zhichao, Li, Shuhui, Li, Lihua, Wu, Bowen, Fu, Jianqiang
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 2021; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Astrobiology; Astronomy; Astrophysics; Astrophysics and Astroparticles; Cosmology; Deep learning; Geomagnetism; Ionospheric electron content; Ionospheric models; KP index; Latitude; Magnetic storms; Mathematical models; Observations and Techniques; Original Article; Parameters; Physics; Physics and Astronomy; Prediction models; Solar activity; Solar cycle; Space Exploration and Astronautics; Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics; Storm forecasting; Sunspot numbers; Sunspots; Total Electron Content; Total electron content (TEC); IRI-2016; Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM); Ionosphere; Prediction
• ISSN: 0004-640X; 1572-946X
• DOI: 10.1007/s10509-020-03907-1

In this paper, the prediction model for ionospheric total electron content (TEC) based on Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) deep learning network and its performance are discussed. The input parameters of the model are previous values of daily TEC, solar radio flux at 10.7 cm parameter of 81 day moving average ( F 107 _ 81 ‾ ), sunspot number (SSN), geomagnetic Kp index, and disturbance storm time (Dst) index, and the outputs are TEC values for the target day. TEC data from January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2016 were used in this study. The dataset almost covers most of the years of the last two solar cycles (23, 24), and it is separated as 81.3% for training, 6.2% for validation, and 12.5% for testing. At BJFS IGS station (39.61° N, 115.89° E), LSTM yielded good TEC estimates with an RMSE of 4.07 TECU in 2001, it was 33% and 48% lower than the RMSE observed in TEC prediction using BP and IRI-2016 models, respectively. In the year of low solar activity (2016), the RMSE predicted by LSTM was 1.78 TECU, it provided 30% and 54% lower RMSE for TEC prediction than for BP and IRI-2016 models. Under the condition of magnetic storm, the LSTM TEC predictions are more consistent with the corresponding IGS Global Ionospheric Maps (GIMs) TEC than TEC predictions by BP and IRI-2016 models. LSTM can better grasp the influence of different external conditions on TEC. Seventeen grid points along 120° E meridian in latitude range from 80° S to 80° N were selected to further study the performance of LSTM model in different latitude. Results show that the prediction accuracy of LSTM is better than that of BP at different latitudes, especially at low latitudes. The performances of the two models are highly correlated with latitude and solar activity, and are both better than that of IRI-2016.