Acceptable Walking and Cycling Distances and their Correlates among Older Japanese Adults

• Published in: Journal of population ageing Vol. 14; no. 2; pp. 183 - 200
• Main Authors: Tsunoda, Kenji, Soma, Yuki, Kitano, Naruki, Jindo, Takashi, Fujii, Keisuke, Okura, Tomohiro
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 01.06.2021; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Access; Accessibility; Adults; Aging; Bicycles; Bicycling; Demography; Destinations; Emotions; Exercise; Geographic information systems; Geriatrics/Gerontology; Medicine/Public Health; Mental depression; Mood; Older people; Remote sensing; Social relations; Social Sciences; Sociology; Travel; Travel modes; Walking; Mobility; Active travel; Built environment; Physical activity; Walkable
• ISSN: 1874-7884; 1874-7876
• DOI: 10.1007/s12062-020-09272-9

This study investigated acceptable walking and cycling distances and their correlates. Cross-sectional data were obtained in 2013 from 8227 people aged ≥65 years in Kasama City, Japan. Acceptable walking distance was assessed by asking “What distance would you walk to a destination from your house?” (responses: ≤ 300 m, ≤ 500 m, ≤ 1 km, ≤ 2 km, ≤ 3 km, and > 3 km). Acceptable cycling distance was assessed using a similar question, with seven response options, including “cannot ride a bicycle.” The most frequently selected acceptable walking distance was ≤1 km. Those who could ride a bicycle most frequently selected ≤2 km as an acceptable cycling distance. Accessibility to various destinations around the participants’ homes was assessed using a geographic information system; these variables for accessibility were integrated using principal component (PC) analysis. Multivariable-adjusted logistic models showed significant positive or negative associations of acceptable walking/cycling distances with age, education, social relationships, frequency of going out, depressive mood, history of falls, and main travel mode. For PC scores for accessibility to various destinations, middle (OR = 0.83, 0.72–0.96) and highest (OR = 0.85, 0.74–0.99) tertile were inversely associated with accepting short cycling distances. Only the middle level PC score (OR = 0.74, 0.64–0.86) was associated with lower odds of accepting a short cycling distance. Older adults may accept active travel options if their destinations are within 1 km for walking or 2 km for cycling. Various internal and external factors determine acceptable travel distances.