Preparation of graphene oxides with different sheet sizes by temperature control
The sheet size of a graphene oxide （GO） can greatly influence its electrical, optical, mechanical, electrochemical and catalytic property. It is a key challenge to how to control the sheet size during its preparation in different application fields. According to our previous theoretical calculations...
Saved in:
| Published in | Chinese physics B Vol. 26; no. 10; pp. 316 - 320 |
|---|---|
| Main Author | |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
01.10.2017
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Summary: | The sheet size of a graphene oxide （GO） can greatly influence its electrical, optical, mechanical, electrochemical and catalytic property. It is a key challenge to how to control the sheet size during its preparation in different application fields. According to our previous theoretical calculations of the effect of temperature on the oxidation process of graphene, we use Hummers method to prepare GOs with different sheet sizes by simply controlling the temperature condition in the process of the oxidation reaction of potassium permanganate （KMnO4） with graphene and the dilution process with deionized water. The results detected by transmission electron microscopy （TEM） and atomic force microscopy （AFM） show that the average sizes of GO sheets prepared at different temperatures are about 1 μm and 7 μm respectively. The ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy （UV-vis） shows that lower temperature can lead to smaller oxidation degrees of GO and less oxygen functional groups on the surface. In addition, we prepare GO membranes to test their mechanical strengths by ultrasonic waves, and we find that the strengths of the GO membranes prepared under low temperatures are considerably higher than those prepared under high temperatures, showing the high mechanical strengths of larger GO sheets. Our experimental results testify our previous theoretical calculations. Compared with the traditional centrifugal separation and chemical cutting method, the preparation process of GO by temperature control is simple and low-cost and also enables large-size synthesis. These findings develop a new method to control GO sheet sizes for large-scale potential applications. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | graphene oxide, sheet size, temperature control, degree of oxidation 11-5639/O4 The sheet size of a graphene oxide （GO） can greatly influence its electrical, optical, mechanical, electrochemical and catalytic property. It is a key challenge to how to control the sheet size during its preparation in different application fields. According to our previous theoretical calculations of the effect of temperature on the oxidation process of graphene, we use Hummers method to prepare GOs with different sheet sizes by simply controlling the temperature condition in the process of the oxidation reaction of potassium permanganate （KMnO4） with graphene and the dilution process with deionized water. The results detected by transmission electron microscopy （TEM） and atomic force microscopy （AFM） show that the average sizes of GO sheets prepared at different temperatures are about 1 μm and 7 μm respectively. The ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy （UV-vis） shows that lower temperature can lead to smaller oxidation degrees of GO and less oxygen functional groups on the surface. In addition, we prepare GO membranes to test their mechanical strengths by ultrasonic waves, and we find that the strengths of the GO membranes prepared under low temperatures are considerably higher than those prepared under high temperatures, showing the high mechanical strengths of larger GO sheets. Our experimental results testify our previous theoretical calculations. Compared with the traditional centrifugal separation and chemical cutting method, the preparation process of GO by temperature control is simple and low-cost and also enables large-size synthesis. These findings develop a new method to control GO sheet sizes for large-scale potential applications. Zhe Qian1, Liang Chen1,2, De-Yuan Li1,2, Bing-Quan Peng2 , Guo-Sheng Shi2, Gang Xu1, Hai-Ping Fang2, Ming-Hong Wu1（1 School of Environment and Chemical Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China ; 2 Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China） |
| ISSN: | 1674-1056 2058-3834 |
| DOI: | 10.1088/1674-1056/26/10/106101 |