Systematic Reviews: Characteristics and Impact

• Published in: Publishing research quarterly Vol. 36; no. 4; pp. 523 - 537
• Main Authors: Halevi, Gali, Pinotti, Rachel
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Springer US 01.12.2020; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Bibliometrics; Impact factors; Library Science; Methodology of the Social Sciences; Printing and Publishing; Social Sciences; Systematic review; Topics; Systematic reviews; Scientific impact; Bibliometrics
• ISSN: 1053-8801; 1936-4792
• DOI: 10.1007/s12109-020-09766-6

Since 1990, systematic reviews are growing exponentially with thousands being published each year. The objectives of this study were to determine both their temporal characteristics in terms of growth per year, subject areas, and publishing affiliations as well as their scientific impact. In this study we used 106,038 systematic reviews collected from Web of Science in 2019. These articles were analyzed to identify topics and publishing institutions, scientific impact and more. Our data shows that while the number of systematic reviews grows each year, their scientific impact diminishes. This can be seen in both citations and usage metrics. The journals that publish the most systematic reviews are below the normal Impact Factor for journals in the medical and biomedical arenas. There are very few institutions around the world, that produce most of the systematic reviews. Topics vary from one institution to another. The sheer number of systematic reviews publications is not an indication of quality or of impact. In fact, our data show that these are on the decline. There seems to be saturation in this area, which results in less interest in and utility of systematic reviews.