Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Weighted Linear Combination: A Case of Gucheng Town in Ningxia, China

• Published in: Geotechnical and geological engineering Vol. 41; no. 2; pp. 1247 - 1273
• Main Authors: Li, Huan, Mao, Zhengjun, Sun, Jiewen, Zhong, Jiaxin, Shi, Shuojie
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cham Springer International Publishing 01.03.2023; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Civil Engineering; Curvature; Earth and Environmental Science; Earth Sciences; Geology; Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences; Groundwater; Hydrogeology; Land use; Landslides; Landslides & mudslides; Lithology; Loess; Methods; Original Paper; Rainfall; Susceptibility; Terrestrial Pollution; Waste Management/Waste Technology; Weight; China; Landslides; Triangular fuzzy number-analytic hierarchy process (TFN-AHP); Random forest (RF); Susceptibility assessment; Frequency ratio (FR); Weighted linear combination (WLC)
• ISSN: 0960-3182; 1573-1529
• DOI: 10.1007/s10706-022-02333-0

The main purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate the applicability of two weighted linear combination methods (WLC) in landslide susceptibility assessment, with Gucheng town of Ningxia province in China taken as the study area. Subsequently, through the study of geological environment characteristics, landslide development and landslide formation mechanism in loess region, divided the slope unit, using TFN-AHP and FR, and RF and FR weighted linear combination methods (WLC) to assess landslide susceptibility. Furthermore, the zoning map of landslide susceptibility assessment was drawn taking into account 11 landslide influencing factors which include elevation, slope, aspect, plan curvature, profile curvature, lithology, rainfall, NDVI, groundwater, land use and distance to river. Meanwhile, this study particularly used WLC to combine the weight of the two models, and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) was used to verify the success rate. The AUC results of TFN-AHP and FR, and RF and FR weighted linear grouping methods were 0.777 and 0.749, respectively. It was then concluded thus, that TFN-AHP and FR, and RF and FR weight linear combination methods could be used in landslide susceptibility assessment research, but different geological environment conditions and assessment units may have a great impact on the research results. RF and FR weighted linear combination method also proved to be inferior to TFN-AHP and FR weighted linear combination method, which may be due to the small number of landslides. Moreover, there is urgent need for further exploration in research areas similar to WLC method, as it certainly holds a significant reference value.