Electrodeposition and characterization of copper sulfide (CuS) thin film: towards an understanding of the growth mechanism

Copper sulfide (CuS) thin film was electrodeposited onto stainless steel (SS 316L) substrate under pulse potential control, from an aqueous acidic solution containing 10 −3  M of CuSO 4 .5H 2 O and 10 −2  M of SC(NH 2 ) 2 . The solution pH was maintained at 2.2 ± 0.1 by adding a few microliters of 0...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of solid state electrochemistry Vol. 27; no. 8; pp. 2051 - 2065
Main Authors Ait-karra, A., Zakir, O., Ait baha, A., Lasri, M., Idouhli, R., Elyaagoubi, M., Abouelfida, A., Khadiri, M., Benzakour, J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.08.2023
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Copper sulfide (CuS) thin film was electrodeposited onto stainless steel (SS 316L) substrate under pulse potential control, from an aqueous acidic solution containing 10 −3  M of CuSO 4 .5H 2 O and 10 −2  M of SC(NH 2 ) 2 . The solution pH was maintained at 2.2 ± 0.1 by adding a few microliters of 0.1 M H 2 SO 4 solution. The electrodeposited thin film was grown at 30 °C by applying a forward potential ( E F ) of − 0.85 V vs Ag/AgCl for 0.2 s and a reverse potential ( E R ) of 0 V vs Ag/AgCl for 0.4 s. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) was used to determine E F and E R as well as the possible reactions that occurred in the studied system and to understand the electrochemical behavior of the SS 316 L substrate on the deposition solutions. Normal and grazing incidence X-ray diffraction (XRD), Raman spectroscopy, and energy-dispersive analysis of X-ray (EDAX) techniques showed that the obtained thin film, applying E F and E R , was a hexagonal covellite CuS. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis showed that the obtained CuS film is grainy and contained some cracks. Profilometry indicated that the elaborated film has a thickness of 7.85 ± 0.71 µm. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and Mott–Schottky (MS) analysis were performed, but the results are controversial because of the participation of SS 316 L substrate in the behavior of the obtained data. Graphical Abstract
ISSN:1432-8488
1433-0768
DOI:10.1007/s10008-023-05471-4