Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Versus Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft in the Treatment of Periodontal Disease: A Clinical and Radiographical Evaluation

AimThe study aimed to clinically and radiographically evaluate the effect of biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) versus demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) in treating periodontal disease.MethodThe study consisted of 44 patients. The sites were randomly assigned to receive one of two trea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCurēus (Palo Alto, CA) Vol. 14; no. 9; p. e29131
Main Authors Kumar, Santosh, Desai, Nahid, Joshi, Surabhi, Hirani, Tanvi, Gajjar, Shreya, Patel, Chandni, Bhakkand, Sushmita R, Girdhar, Gaurav A, Govindool, Sharaschandra R, Wan Ahmad Fakuradzi, Wan Farizatul Shima, Haque, Mainul
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Palo Alto Cureus Inc 13.09.2022
Cureus
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:AimThe study aimed to clinically and radiographically evaluate the effect of biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) versus demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) in treating periodontal disease.MethodThe study consisted of 44 patients. The sites were randomly assigned to receive one of two treatment modalities (BCP at site 1 and demineralized freeze-dried bone at site 2) by a computerized method. All the clinical data were measured with the help of a University of North Carolina-15 (UNC-15) probe at the baseline, three months, and six months postoperatively. Radiovisiographs were taken using a Rinn XCP® (Dentsply/Rinn Corp, Elgin, IL) system and an oral grid using the paralleling technique. A manual calculation of the defect area was undertaken at the end of six months and was compared with the other groups.ResultThe linear bone growth recorded for site 1 at the end of six months was 3.8 ± 1.14 mm, and site 2 was 4.6 ± 1.07 mm. The intergroup comparison showed more remarkable linear bone growth in site 2, which was statistically insignificant, with a mean difference of 0.8 ± 1.23 mm and a p-value of 0.07.ConclusionImprovements were observed on all the documented parameters. However, the sites treated with DFDBA showed better periodontal regeneration.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2168-8184
2168-8184
DOI:10.7759/cureus.29131