A tale of two cities, with bears: understanding attitudes towards urban bears in British Columbia, Canada

• Published in: Urban ecosystems Vol. 22; no. 5; pp. 961 - 973
• Main Authors: Booth, Annie L., Ryan, Daniel A. J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Springer US 01.10.2019; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Attitudes; Bears; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Ecology; Environmental Management; Food sources; Fruit trees; Garbage; Habitat loss; Human behavior; Life Sciences; Nature Conservation; Polls & surveys; Preservation; Urban areas; Urban Ecology; Urban environments; British Columbia Canada; Canada; Black bear management; Public attitudes towards wildlife; Urban wildlife
• ISSN: 1083-8155; 1573-1642
• DOI: 10.1007/s11252-019-00873-7

The management of black bears ( Ursus americanus ) in urban and/or exurban settings is of growing concern as these mammals, along with coyotes, cougars and others, begin to re-colonize areas from which they had been extirpated. Urban and exurban landscapes can offer much needed habitat to these space-demanding creatures, thereby buffering habitat losses in other areas and protecting populations of these species, but only if conflicts between these animals and humans can be managed and minimized. In the case of urban black bears, they can become quickly labled as a “problem” bear if they become too reliant on human garbage or other food sources such as fruit trees. A “problem” bear usually becomes a dead bear. In collaboration with the Northern Bear Awareness Society in Prince George, British Columbia, Canada, UNBC researchers undertook two surveys of Prince George over a 3 year period and a companion survey in the city of Coquitlam, BC to examine attitudes towards urban bears. The research found that residents of both cities, in spite of regular and close encounters with black bears, strongly supported the presence and preservation of bears within an urban setting, largely due to conservation concerns. Both communities were supportive of non-lethal control of “problem bears” and supported the use of warnings and fines to discourage human behaviors that created human-bear conflicts over lethal controls. These findings offer support for municipal governments to reconsider approaches to urban bear management.