N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) augmentation in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder: A phase III, 20-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Preliminary evidence has suggested that adjunctive N-acetylcysteine (NAC), an antioxidant precursor to glutathione, may reduce symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). We conducted a 20-week, multi-site, randomized controlled trial to investigate the safety and efficacy of the adjunctive use...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProgress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry Vol. 117; p. 110550
Main Authors Sarris, Jerome, Byrne, Gerard, Castle, David, Bousman, Chad, Oliver, Georgina, Cribb, Lachlan, Blair-West, Scott, Brakoulias, Vlasios, Camfield, David, Ee, Carolyn, Chamoli, Suneel, Boschen, Mark, Dean, Olivia M., Dowling, Nathan, Menon, Ranjit, Murphy, Jenifer, Metri, Najwa-Joelle, Nguyen, Thomas P., Wong, Andrew, Jordan, Rebecca, Karamacoska, Diana, Rossell, Susan L., Berk, Michael, Ng, Chee H.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Inc 13.07.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Preliminary evidence has suggested that adjunctive N-acetylcysteine (NAC), an antioxidant precursor to glutathione, may reduce symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). We conducted a 20-week, multi-site, randomized controlled trial to investigate the safety and efficacy of the adjunctive use of NAC in OCD. The study was a phase III, 20-week, double-blind, randomized controlled trial across multiple sites in Australia investigating 2 g to 4 g per day of NAC (titrated according to response) in 98 participants with DSM-5 diagnosed OCD. Data were analysed using linear mixed effects models for the 89 participants who attended at least one follow-up visit. A modified intention-to-treat analysis of the primary outcome found no evidence that NAC reduced symptoms of OCD measured on the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale, relative to placebo (mean difference at week 20 = 0.53, 95% compatibility interval = −2.18, 3.23; p = 0.70; favouring placebo). There was also no evidence that NAC, compared to placebo, improved outcomes on the secondary measures including anxiety, depression, quality of life, functioning, or clinician/participant impression. NAC was well-tolerated with only mild gastrointestinal adverse events associated with the treatment. We found no evidence supporting the efficacy of the adjunctive use of NAC in OCD. •We conducted a randomized controlled trial to investigate the safety and efficacy of the adjunctive use of NAC in OCD•Results revealed no evidence that NAC reduced symptoms of OCD (measured on the Y-BOCS), relative to placebo•The mean difference at week 20 = 0.53, 95% compatibility interval = -2.18, 3.23; p = 0.70; favouring placebo•There was no evidence that NAC improved outcomes for secondary measures such as anxiety or depression, compared to placebo•NAC was well-tolerated with only mild gastrointestinal adverse events associated with the treatment
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-News-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0278-5846
1878-4216
DOI:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2022.110550