Paclitaxel-eluting stents reduce neointimal hyperplasia compared to bare metal stents in saphenous vein grafts: intravascular ultrasonography analysis of the SOS (Stenting of Saphenous Vein Grafts) trial

To compare the intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS) findings between saphenous vein grafts (SVG) treated with paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) vs. bare metal stents (BMS) in the Stenting Of Saphenous Vein Grafts (SOS) trial. Of the 80 SOS trial patients, 38 had both baseline and follow-up IVUS examin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuroIntervention Vol. 7; no. 8; pp. 948 - 954
Main Authors JEROUDI, Omar M, ABDEL-KARIM, Abdul-Rahman R, RAGHUNATHAN, Deepa, DASILVA, Monica, SAEED, Bilal, BISSETT, Joseph K, SACHDEVA, Rajesh, VOUDRIS, Vassilios V, KARYOFILLIS, Panagiotis, KAR, Biswajit, ROSSEN, James, FASSEAS, Panayotis, MICHAEL, Tesfaldet T, BERGER, Peter, BANERJEE, Subhash, BRILAKIS, Emmanouil S, LICHTENWALTER, Christopher, DE LEMOS, James A, OBEL, Owen, ADDO, Tayo, ROESLE, Michele, HAAGEN, Donald, RANGAN, Bavana V
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Toulouse Société Europa Edition 01.12.2011
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To compare the intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS) findings between saphenous vein grafts (SVG) treated with paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) vs. bare metal stents (BMS) in the Stenting Of Saphenous Vein Grafts (SOS) trial. Of the 80 SOS trial patients, 38 had both baseline and follow-up IVUS examination and were included in this substudy: 17 patients received 28 BMS in 26 lesions and 21 patients received 30 PES in 28 lesions. Quantitative IVUS analysis was performed to determine the volume of in-stent neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) - defined as the difference between stent volume and lumen volume in the stented segments. Baseline characteristics were similar between patients who did and did not undergo baseline and follow-up IVUS. Patients receiving BMS and PES had similar stent and lumen volumes immediately after stenting. At 12-month follow-up, compared to BMS, PES-treated lesions had significantly less NIH volume (3.4 vs. 21.9 mm³, p<0.001) and neointima hyperplasia progression (1.6 vs. 17.1 mm³, p<0.001). No significant differences were seen in the 5 mm segment proximal and distal to the stent. Compared to BMS, use of PES in SVG lesions is associated with significantly lower NIH formation, which may help explain the improved clinical outcomes with PES in these lesions.
ISSN:1774-024X
1969-6213
DOI:10.4244/EIJV7I8A150