Comparing cytology, colposcopy and human papillomavirus cervical intraepithelial lesion screening methods in women with systemic lupus erythematosus

Objective To compare the performance of cytology, colposcopy and human papillomavirus in detecting cervical intraepithelial lesions in women with systemic lupus erythematosus. Methods Papanicolaou smears (normal, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion),...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inLupus Vol. 29; no. 9; pp. 1060 - 1066
Main Authors García-Carrasco, Mario, Mendoza-Pinto, Claudia, Méndez-Martínez, Socorro, Rodríguez-Reyes, Ariadna, Munguía-Realpozo, Pamela, Taboada-Cole, Alejandro, Vallejo-Ruiz, Verónica, Etchegaray-Morales, Ivet, Jiménez-Herrera, Rebeca, Juárez-Melchor, Daniela, Villanueva-López, Isaí
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England SAGE Publications 01.08.2020
Sage Publications Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective To compare the performance of cytology, colposcopy and human papillomavirus in detecting cervical intraepithelial lesions in women with systemic lupus erythematosus. Methods Papanicolaou smears (normal, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion), colposcopy findings, human papillomavirus and co-testing (Papanicolaou smear + human papillomavirus) were compared with cervical biopsy findings in women with systemic lupus erythematosus. Sensitivity, specificity, false-positive and false-negative rates, positive and negative predictive values and likelihood ratios of cytologic smears, colposcopy findings, human papillomavirus and co-testing were determined. Results Cytology and colposcopy were performed in 170 systemic lupus erythematosus women (mean age and disease duration of 43.7±12.1 years and 9.7±5.3 years, respectively) and biopsies were performed in 55 patients (38.2% normal, 60.0% low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and 1.8% high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of cytology were 14.7% (95% confidence interval 5.5–31.8%), 95.2% (95% confidence interval 74.1–99.7%), 83.3% (95% confidence interval 36.4–99.1%) and 40.8% (95% confidence interval 27.3–55.7%), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of colposcopy findings were 100.0% (95% confidence interval 87.3–100.0%), 0.0% (95% confidence interval 0.0–19.2%) and 61.8% (95% confidence interval 47.7–74.2%), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of co-testing were 8.0% (95% confidence interval 1.3–27.5%) and 100.0% (95% confidence interval 71.6–100.0%). The positive predictive value and negative predictive values were 100.0% (95% confidence interval 19.7–100.0%) and 36.1% (95% confidence interval 33.5–38.8%), respectively. Conclusions In systemic lupus erythematosus patients, colposcopy impressions were more sensitive than cytology and co-testing. However, cytology and co-testing were the most specific tests. The results should be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0961-2033
1477-0962
DOI:10.1177/0961203320931176